Danvers Indoor Sports - DANVERS, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DHAIYA Tanya | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% | |
2 | XIAO Nancy | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 52% |
3 | BALAZS Luca | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 35% |
3 | LAW Mila | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
5 | EKSHTUT Leah | - | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
6 | YANG Hanting(Catherine) | - | - | 1% | 14% | 50% | 34% | |
7 | LI Caroline | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 45% |
8 | LOBANOVA Varvara | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 45% | 15% |
9 | TCHERNYSHOV ANNA | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 46% | 18% |
10 | WANG Sophie Y. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 47% | 41% | |
11 | RICHARDSON Meredith | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 37% | 50% |
12 | DING Iris Siyue | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
13 | CHEN Alina | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 14% | |
14 | LI Alice | - | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 46% | 23% |
15 | YOUN Emily | 7% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | |
16 | LIU Chloe | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
17 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 29% | |
18 | CHEN Allison | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% | - |
19 | IVANOV Angela-Sophie | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
20 | CHERNOBRIVETS Maria | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
21 | GRUDZINSKI Josephine | 7% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
22 | XIAO Katelyn | - | 4% | 34% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
23 | SUN Nicole | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | - |
24 | CHEN Yudian | 3% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
25 | YANAGIDA Coco | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
26 | JIANG chenxi | - | 8% | 45% | 39% | 8% | - | |
27 | ZHU Una | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% | |
28 | TIAN Victoria | 4% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
29 | YU Eva | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% | |
30 | ORDORICA Abra | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
31 | XU Mulan | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
32 | POYNTON Cora | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
33 | ZHANG Flora | 36% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
34 | SONKU Mira | 9% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | |
35 | MISHIMA Olivia | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
36 | JAISON Carol | 42% | 49% | 8% | - | - | - | |
37 | SONG Charlotte | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | - |
38 | CROWDER Julia | 19% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
39 | GUO Callista | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
39 | CLERMONT Chloe | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
41 | WESTERFELD Zoey | 62% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
42 | CHI Evelyn | 41% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
43 | WU Madisen | 12% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | |
44 | GARZON Lucia | 40% | 50% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
45 | WORMHOOD Alexa | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
46 | ERIKSEN Kate | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.