Modern Duelists Fencing Academy - Elkton, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 61% |
2 | WICAS Graham E. | - | - | - | - | - | 11% | 89% |
3 | VANDINGSTEE Keith | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 40% | 10% | |
3 | DICKENS Robert W. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 36% | 56% | |
5 | ADAMS Zachary J. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 53% | 5% |
6 | DOLBOW Trevor | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% | - |
7 | GAMBINO Robert A. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 35% | 42% | 9% |
8 | CUMMINGS Owen | 2% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
9 | CHAWLA Aarav | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 7% | - |
10 | LEVESQUE Gabriel | - | 4% | 26% | 45% | 23% | 3% | - |
11 | KARASICK Andrew | 2% | 17% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
12 | HUTZ Michael B. | 1% | 11% | 34% | 38% | 15% | 1% | |
13 | GOVOROV Alexander | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 18% | 2% | - |
14 | KIM Zac | 11% | 40% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - | |
15 | WROBEL Julia | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
16 | MAGUIRE Timothy | 51% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
17 | WOHNER Kenneth S. | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
18 | TAN Theodore | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
19 | BOWIE Charlotta | 5% | 45% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
20 | TRAN Alex | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.