Fence St. Louis - St. Louis, MO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHU Matthew | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% | ||
| 2 | DANNULL Linus N. | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 26% |
| 3 | HAMMOND Jonathon | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 47% | |
| 3 | BROCKMEYER Tyler | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | ||
| 5 | DREWES James | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 8% | |
| 6 | SMALLEY Luke | - | - | - | 6% | 37% | 43% | 13% |
| 7 | WILSON Seth | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 4% | ||
| 8 | BYRON Andrew | 25% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | ||
| 9 | SOBERY Lillian | 13% | 43% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 10 | KOSGI Krivik | - | 2% | 25% | 47% | 23% | 3% | |
| 11 | STOCKMANN Xavier | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | ||
| 12 | ZENG William | - | 3% | 21% | 47% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 13 | FINN Lucy | 20% | 46% | 29% | 4% | - | - | |
| 14 | THOMPSON Owen | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | ||
| 15 | HODES Greg | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% | ||
| 16 | SHIVELY Erik | 6% | 36% | 43% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 17 | LADY Jamie | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | ||
| 18 | MORRIS Halen | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% | ||
| 19 | ZENG Anna Missing ID | |||||||
| 20 | HASTY Avery | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 21 | SWISTON Forrest Missing ID | |||||||
| 22 | HATFIELD-LADD Astrid | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | HECHINGER Whyatt | 3% | 33% | 44% | 18% | 2% | ||
| 24 | YOUNG Adam | 3% | 23% | 45% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 25 | PATE Hudson | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.