Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PARK Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 62% |
| 2 | XU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 15% |
| 3 | WANG Waylon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | 3% |
| 3 | PARK Kaiden | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 5 | SLAIN Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 6 | EVANS Desmond | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% | |
| 7 | RAU Shogun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 33% |
| 8 | MURDOCK Koichi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% | |
| 9 | LYU Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
| 10 | QU Zhida (richard) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 62% |
| 11 | ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
| 12 | PARK Avan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% |
| 13 | TAO Jiemi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
| 14 | JIN Yucheng | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 9% | |
| 15 | DING Sam | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% | |
| 16 | ZHANG William | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 17 | CREMEL Remi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 18 | SUN Lucas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 19 | LIU Bradley | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 20 | JUE Lucas | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | RAJ Yojith | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 22 | LI Lief | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 23 | CHEN Dante | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 24 | FOO Kingston | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
| 25 | NGUYEN Norris | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 26 | TSUI Kaylan Ho Sen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 33% | 5% | |
| 27 | PESKIN Kepler | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 3% |
| 28 | KAJITA Grayson | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 29 | YU Jinyuan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 30 | LI Yunze | 100% | 97% | 78% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
| 31 | LIGERET Leo | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 32 | SAVAGE Angus | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 33 | SUN Oliver | 100% | 100% | 95% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 34 | WONG Sebastian | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | LIN Dylan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 36 | LO Enzo | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 37 | LAM Lazarus | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | MENG Andy | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 39 | MA Madrid | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | YU Ethan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 41 | YAN Aaron | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | CHONG Tanner | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 43 | RYU Griffin | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 44 | LIN Calvin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 45 | WANG Theodore | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 46 | LIN Conrad | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 47 | DONG YIKUN | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 48 | BROD Baylin | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | GU Evan | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | XU Benjamin | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | ZHANG Alex | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | MENG Eric | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 53 | LIN Stewart | 100% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | ZHANG Bryant | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | LIM Jun Rui | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 56 | MCBRIDE Sam | 100% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 57 | DENG Augustine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 5% |
| 58 | ZHANG Derek | 100% | 82% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | ZENG Cayden | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | RAMIREZ Nicanor | 100% | 96% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 61 | REILLY Boden | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.