Air Force Cadet Field House - Air Force Academy, CO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MCMANIGAL Matthew L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | |
| 2 | MARENCIK Miles | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% | - | |
| 3 | ISAACSON Calev | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 18% | 1% | |
| 3 | SCHWITZER Eliot | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
| 5 | JAN Timothy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 3% | |
| 6 | ONG Jee Ken | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 59% | |
| 7 | TIEKING Noah | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 8 | COSGROVE Franklin | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 9 | SOKOLOVAS Genadijus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | |
| 10 | KENT IV David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 16% |
| 11 | DENG Destin | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 10% | 1% | |
| 12 | GUO Woody | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
| 14 | STEIN Ethan M. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
| 15 | LEWIS-RAMIREZ Ben | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 13% | |
| 16 | REID Wesley | 100% | 91% | 58% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | KIM Remington | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 18 | YANG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 13% | |
| 19 | SUN Neo | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 20 | WATT Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 39% |
| 21 | EYMAN Hans | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 9% | |
| 22 | EMERSON Zachary | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 23 | COLEMAN Ian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% | |
| 24 | RAHMAN Ali | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 25 | KRAMER Mark | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | |
| 26 | RAHMAN Zayd | 100% | 81% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | DILEEP Roshan | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 28 | MARTEGANI Enea | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | STAFURIK John (Jack) W. | 100% | 79% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | DEAN Samuel | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | HONG Daniel | 100% | 97% | 79% | 38% | 8% | - | |
| 32 | MAGNUSON Thomas | 100% | 85% | 47% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | DAVIDSON James | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | CROY Felix | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 35 | WYLIE Luke | 100% | 87% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | ANDERSON Donald | 100% | 97% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 37 | FACKRELL Jacen | 100% | 95% | 58% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | DEAN Isaac | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.