Elite Sportplex - Waterford Township, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BING Charlotte | - | - | - | - | 1% | 19% | 80% |
| 2 | LIN Katherine | - | - | - | 5% | 26% | 47% | 22% |
| 3 | HOROWITZ Shuli | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
| 3 | MUMMANENI Samyuta | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
| 5 | KNAPP Isabella | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
| 6 | YAO abby | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
| 7 | YIN Chloe | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
| 8 | NEUMANN Erika | - | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 40% | 10% |
| 9 | LEE Jeemin | - | - | 3% | 21% | 46% | 29% | |
| 10 | RIVERA Leahy | - | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 50% | 7% |
| 11 | YANG Olivia | - | - | 3% | 14% | 37% | 39% | 7% |
| 12 | HUANG Natalie | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 13 | DONG Iris | - | - | 5% | 25% | 46% | 24% | |
| 14 | KOU Elisha | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 15 | CULLIVAN Sienna | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 16 | DHALIWAL Seerat | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 17 | HU Sophie | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 42% |
| 18 | FRASER Morgan | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% |
| 19 | BOIKE Lucille | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
| 20 | MALIK Manha | - | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 21 | LIU Bella | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | < 1% | - |
| 22 | SUN Nicole | 2% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 23 | DENG Claire | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 9% |
| 24 | ZHANG Caroline | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 25 | LEO Jenna | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 4% |
| 26 | ZHANG Selina | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 22% | 4% |
| 27 | SHUI Zola | 2% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 28 | KUANG Bella | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | SALMI-BYDALEK Ada | - | 7% | 34% | 40% | 16% | 2% | |
| 30 | TELEB Farida | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 31 | SMOLICH Emily | - | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 32 | SAMALA Reese | - | 5% | 29% | 43% | 20% | 3% | |
| 33 | HUANG Emma | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 34 | KIM Yuna | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 35 | HAFEZ Sahar | - | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 36 | SHAOOLIAN Maya | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 37 | REDEMANN Reagan | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | LUO lucy | - | 4% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 5% | |
| 39 | XU Charlene | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | HUANG Gabrielle | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 41 | HUANG Rosalyn | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | CHUNG Stella | 1% | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 43 | YIN Emily | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 44 | KASHUBA Mila | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% | - |
| 45 | FAROOQI Eliora | 4% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - | - |
| 46 | SMART Athena | 1% | 10% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 47 | EPSTEIN Naomi | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 35% | 8% | |
| 48 | KIM Lauren | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 49 | MA Sophia | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 50 | BELL Blake | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | ZOLDAN Nolabelle | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 52 | REN Luna Siyi | 29% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 53 | LIN Athena | 12% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | MARTIN Avery | 9% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 55 | KIM Audrey | 12% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | GONZALEZ Lauren | 36% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 57 | ZENG Linya | 27% | 47% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 58 | CHAN Hailey | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 59 | ELLISON Ingrid | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 60 | LALONDE Beatrice | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | LEE Eun-Hae | 11% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 62 | CULLIVAN Elise | - | 8% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 63 | EDGAR Koko | 14% | 48% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | KOSCIK-AQUINO Emily | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 65 | JIMÉNEZ PELAY Claudia | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 66 | SAVIOZ Naomi | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 67 | LEIBERMAN Talia | 61% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 68 | JIN Sophia | 32% | 47% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 69 | RAJAN Anjali | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 70 | KAGAN Natalie | 39% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 71 | LI Aiyu | 1% | 16% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 72 | DUDLEY Kaitrin | < 1% | 2% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 72 | KANASZ Peyton | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 74 | NA Adelaide | 2% | 16% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 75 | KERR Ingrid | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.