Factory 220 - Passaic, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DANIELS Jordanna | - | - | 2% | 18% | 68% | 12% | |
| 2 | WILLER Anna | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% | |
| 3 | KARAVAS Lucy | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 1% | |
| 3 | XU Isabella | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 5 | VARAH Alaia | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 6 | LIU Alyssa | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 7 | GU Allison | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | |
| 8 | AN Jasmine | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 9 | BAO Amelia | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 10 | GERSON Lilly | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 11 | AVATAPALLI Sri Aadya | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
| 12 | FENG chloe | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 13 | ALPEROVICH Madeline | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 14 | ONG Katherine | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 15 | ZHANG Annalyn | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 16 | LAMTAN Trinity | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | |
| 17 | SAXENA Devina Shyamli | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 18 | KONG Hermione | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
| 19 | YAP Anna | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 20 | BIVIJI Rania | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 21 | FREY Elise | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 22 | CHEN Chloe | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 23 | KRISHNAN Anu | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 24 | PUR-RASHID Kiva | 7% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | KRITZ Sofia | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | |
| 26 | KONDE Anika | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 27 | YANG Rachel | 8% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
| 28 | SINGH Zara | - | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | |
| 29 | DEMATTEIS Katarina | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 30 | RIFKIN Talia | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 31 | WU Jing | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | TANG Julia | < 1% | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 28% | |
| 33 | BORROK Katherine | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | GAO Madeleine | - | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 35 | PRAKASH Lithika | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | AVDEEV Katherine | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | LEOU Eliana | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | LONG Penelope | < 1% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.