Factory 220 - Passaic, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% |
2 | BADROEL RIZWAN Uzair Zafran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 45% |
3 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% |
3 | DOELL Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
5 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
6 | SONG Noel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 58% |
7 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 11% | |
8 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
9 | SHANNON Jack | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 23% | ||
10 | MARTIRE Luca | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% | - |
11 | LI Arvin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 27% |
12 | XIE Jicheng | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
13 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% | |
13 | HAYES Stewart | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 13% | |
15 | HOLLIS Sean | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 3% |
16 | BAI Austin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 2% |
17 | CHO Jadon Yushin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% | |
18 | BAKSHI Aman | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
19 | ABRAMKIN Tim | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 2% |
20 | ARCE Andrew W. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 5% | |
21 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% | ||
22 | PECK Quinn | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 15% | ||
23 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 18% | ||
24 | OH Joshua | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
25 | JIMENEZ Naveen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 16% |
26 | METZ Mason | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | - |
27 | JANNEY Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | 3% |
28 | CHA James | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
29 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 8% | |
30 | BLACK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 6% | |
31 | HAN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 12% | 1% |
32 | TANG Royce | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
33 | XU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 2% |
34 | LEE Charles T | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
35 | MAK Collin Chun Shing | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
36 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
37 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 32% | |
38 | SFINTESCU Alex | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - |
39 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
40 | GRIGORIEV Michael | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
41 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 1% | ||
42 | BELOKON Sammy | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 25% | 3% | - |
43 | ROJAS Elijah | 100% | 90% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
44 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 6% | ||
45 | KUO Phineas | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 4% | - |
46 | MARTIN Mason | 100% | 98% | 80% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
47 | KO Caleb | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 22% | 2% | |
48 | ZHANG GAVIN J | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
49 | FALCONE Jack | 100% | 80% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
50 | TAM Kyle | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 2% |
51 | HOLMES Alexiy | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
52 | EDISON Ansel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
53 | SCHEURER Edwin | 100% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
54 | GODIN Willis | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
55 | ANGELOS Nico | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
56 | SUN Henry | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 9% | ||
57 | XU Ryan | 100% | 66% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
58 | MIRCHANDANI Aditya | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
59 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 97% | 76% | 33% | 6% | - | - |
60 | MCCARTHY Hudson | 100% | 77% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
61 | LEONG Samuel | 100% | 99% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
62 | CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau | 100% | 72% | 29% | 5% | - | ||
63 | LEE Thomas | 100% | 83% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | |
64 | POLLIO Benjamin | 100% | 69% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
65 | KAYE Ben | 100% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | ||
66 | KWON Chase | 100% | 80% | 36% | 8% | 1% | ||
67 | EZEKIEL Nathan | 100% | 55% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
68 | ZHANG Julian | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
69 | SANTHOSH Rithwik | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
70 | ESPINAL Ryan | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
71 | REN Ryan | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
72 | DIAZ Gabriel | 100% | 89% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
73 | LIN Justin | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
74 | ROZENBLIT Nick | 100% | 94% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
75 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
76 | KRZYWON Dylan | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
77 | LINGAMPALLI Sashank | 100% | 7% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.