Factory 220 - Passaic, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% |
| 2 | BADROEL RIZWAN Uzair Zafran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 45% |
| 3 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% |
| 3 | DOELL Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
| 5 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
| 6 | SONG Noel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 58% |
| 7 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 11% | |
| 8 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
| 9 | SHANNON Jack | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 23% | ||
| 10 | MARTIRE Luca | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% | - |
| 11 | LI Arvin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 27% |
| 12 | XIE Jicheng | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 13 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% | |
| 13 | HAYES Stewart | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 13% | |
| 15 | HOLLIS Sean | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 3% |
| 16 | BAI Austin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 2% |
| 17 | CHO Jadon Yushin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% | |
| 18 | BAKSHI Aman | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 19 | ABRAMKIN Tim | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 22% | 2% |
| 20 | ARCE Andrew W. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 5% | |
| 21 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% | ||
| 22 | PECK Quinn | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 15% | ||
| 23 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 18% | ||
| 24 | OH Joshua | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 25 | JIMENEZ Naveen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 16% |
| 26 | METZ Mason | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 11% | - |
| 27 | JANNEY Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | 3% |
| 28 | CHA James | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
| 29 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 8% | |
| 30 | BLACK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 6% | |
| 31 | HAN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 12% | 1% |
| 32 | TANG Royce | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 33 | XU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 18% | 1% |
| 34 | LEE Charles T | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 35 | MAK Collin Chun Shing | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
| 36 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 37 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 32% | |
| 38 | SFINTESCU Alex | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 39 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 40 | GRIGORIEV Michael | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 41 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 1% | ||
| 42 | BELOKON Sammy | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 25% | 3% | - |
| 43 | ROJAS Elijah | 100% | 90% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 6% | ||
| 45 | KUO Phineas | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 46 | MARTIN Mason | 100% | 98% | 80% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
| 47 | KO Caleb | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 22% | 2% | |
| 48 | ZHANG GAVIN J | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
| 49 | FALCONE Jack | 100% | 80% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | TAM Kyle | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 2% |
| 51 | HOLMES Alexiy | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 52 | EDISON Ansel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
| 53 | SCHEURER Edwin | 100% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | GODIN Willis | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 55 | ANGELOS Nico | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 56 | SUN Henry | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 10% | ||
| 57 | XU Ryan | 100% | 66% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 58 | MIRCHANDANI Aditya | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 59 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 97% | 76% | 33% | 6% | - | - |
| 60 | MCCARTHY Hudson | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | LEONG Samuel | 100% | 99% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 62 | CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau | 100% | 72% | 29% | 5% | - | ||
| 63 | LEE Thomas | 100% | 83% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 64 | POLLIO Benjamin | 100% | 69% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 65 | KAYE Ben | 100% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | ||
| 66 | KWON Chase | 100% | 80% | 36% | 8% | 1% | ||
| 67 | EZEKIEL Nathan | 100% | 55% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 68 | ZHANG Julian | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 69 | SANTHOSH Rithwik | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | ESPINAL Ryan | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | REN Ryan | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 72 | DIAZ Gabriel | 100% | 89% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 73 | LIN Justin | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 74 | ROZENBLIT Nick | 100% | 94% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 75 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 76 | KRZYWON Dylan | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 77 | LINGAMPALLI Sashank | 100% | 7% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.