Factory 220 - Passaic, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | - | - | - | - | - | 11% | 88% |
2 | GANSER Nicole | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 10% |
3 | SONG Angela | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 66% |
3 | BOROTKO Katerina | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | |
5 | PETROFF Eva | - | 5% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
6 | GARCIA Alysia | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 24% | 5% | |
7 | CHEN Alina | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
8 | LAW Mila | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
9 | GOH Cayla | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% | |
10 | NOVOJILOV Anastasia | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 49% | 31% |
11 | KUMAR Eva | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
12 | PRESMAN Aerin | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 47% | 38% |
13 | WONG Sydney | - | - | 2% | 18% | 43% | 35% | 2% |
14 | YU Livia | 4% | 22% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
15 | NING Miranda | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% | |
16 | LI Caroline | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% | |
17 | VENKATESAN Harshitha | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
18 | JU Jennifer | 9% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | |
19 | MISHIMA Audrey | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% | |
20 | XIAO Katelyn | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 7% | - | |
21 | CHERNOBRIVETS Maria | - | 1% | 13% | 40% | 36% | 10% | - |
22 | GOLIYAD Lisa | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 41% | 15% | - |
23 | LEE Eden | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
24 | LOBANOVA Varvara | - | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 33% | 5% |
25 | WU Madisen | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - | - |
26 | KAKANI Aditi | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
27 | IVANOV Angela-Sophie | 6% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
28 | ALLIEVI Simone | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% | - |
29 | JIANG chenxi | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | |
30 | XU Mulan | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
31 | HSU Catherine | 14% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
32 | TIAN Victoria | 1% | 10% | 43% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - |
33 | FOMINA Polina | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 4% | |
34 | GAVILANES Madyson | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
35 | STOCKTON Catherine | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
36 | LIU Lillian | 26% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
37 | CHAKRAPANI Tara | 14% | 40% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
38 | BISONO Valentina | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 18% | 2% |
39 | YANAGIDA Coco | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
40 | PAREKH Riana | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
41 | MILLER Cassandra | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
42 | MENKIN Kate | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
43 | GRUDZINSKI Josephine | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
44 | ALVAREZ Martine | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
45 | LAU Karina | 30% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
46 | JAISON Carol | 55% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.