Factory 220 - Passaic, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHIANG William | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 22% |
| 2 | YAO Ryan | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 48% |
| 3 | CHEN Aiden | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
| 3 | KO Ethan | 1% | 9% | 24% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 5 | NOOL Aaron | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% | |
| 6 | LAI Jayden | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 7 | YAO Aiden | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
| 8 | CHEN Regis | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 9 | GUJJA Rishabh | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 11% |
| 10 | ARMSTRONG Payson | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 35% | 16% |
| 11 | ZHU David | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 12 | CHEN Daniel | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
| 13 | TANG Jayce | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 14 | JAISING Kian | 11% | 30% | 33% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 15 | MAURAIS JP | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 16 | NG Remy | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
| 17 | LITVINOVSKY Benjamin | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 18 | DUDDA Kavin | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | KIM Brendan | 11% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 20 | ZINCHUK Yuri | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | LAI Jaxon | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 22 | SHABBIR Mohammad Amaan | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 23 | SALIBA Jackson | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 24 | CHEUNG Daniel | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | |
| 25 | CARPENTER Taisei | 7% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | LIU FREDERICK | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 27 | GOH Cayden | 1% | 8% | 23% | 32% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 28 | GOOD Adam | 34% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 29 | YOU Emmanuel | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 30 | GORE Noah | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | HERIGSTAD Daniel | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 31 | PRIETO Cole | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 33 | YIN Xiangheng | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 34 | YAN Milan | 7% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | YONG Connor | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 6% |
| 36 | LAW Benjamin | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | CHARNA Luca | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 38 | HWANG Chase | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 39 | YADAV Aarav | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 40 | YANG JULIAN | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 41 | MAK Nolan | 19% | 37% | 29% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.