Factory 220 - Passaic, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHIANG William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% |
| 2 | YAO Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% |
| 3 | CHEN Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
| 3 | KO Ethan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 5 | NOOL Aaron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 17% | |
| 6 | LAI Jayden | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 49% | 19% | 3% |
| 7 | YAO Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
| 8 | CHEN Regis | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | GUJJA Rishabh | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
| 10 | ARMSTRONG Payson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 16% |
| 11 | ZHU David | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 12 | CHEN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% | |
| 13 | TANG Jayce | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 14 | JAISING Kian | 100% | 89% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 15 | MAURAIS JP | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 16 | NG Remy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 17 | LITVINOVSKY Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 18 | DUDDA Kavin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 19 | KIM Brendan | 100% | 89% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 20 | ZINCHUK Yuri | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 21 | LAI Jaxon | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 22 | SHABBIR Mohammad Amaan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 23 | SALIBA Jackson | 100% | 97% | 81% | 51% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 24 | CHEUNG Daniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 9% | |
| 25 | CARPENTER Taisei | 100% | 93% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 26 | LIU FREDERICK | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 27 | GOH Cayden | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 28 | GOOD Adam | 100% | 66% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 29 | YOU Emmanuel | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 30 | GORE Noah | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | HERIGSTAD Daniel | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 31 | PRIETO Cole | 100% | 96% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 33 | YIN Xiangheng | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 34 | YAN Milan | 100% | 93% | 66% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | YONG Connor | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
| 36 | LAW Benjamin | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | CHARNA Luca | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | HWANG Chase | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 39 | YADAV Aarav | 100% | 96% | 78% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 40 | YANG JULIAN | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 41 | MAK Nolan | 100% | 81% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.