Factory 220 - Passaic, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MCSHERRY Ava | - | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 82% |
| 2 | LI Han (Helina) | - | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 74% |
| 3 | TSIMIKLIS Aphrodite | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 39% | 54% |
| 3 | CAO Amelie | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 26% | 2% |
| 5 | MCSHERRY Kayla | - | - | 2% | 17% | 49% | 31% | |
| 6 | EYER Brooke | - | - | - | 5% | 26% | 50% | 18% |
| 6 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | - | - | - | - | 5% | 36% | 59% |
| 8 | LI Savannah | - | - | 2% | 14% | 39% | 37% | 8% |
| 9 | LI Joy | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 53% | 19% |
| 10 | PEVZNER Nicole | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% |
| 11 | KAPRAN Anastasia | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 53% | 35% |
| 12 | DE CASTRO Kai | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 38% | 10% |
| 13 | OLAWOYE Jadesola | - | 1% | 14% | 40% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 14 | KRAHE Annika | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 34% | 3% |
| 15 | ROBERTS Anastasia | - | - | 1% | 12% | 39% | 42% | 6% |
| 16 | MCFARLANE Asha | - | - | 1% | 15% | 47% | 37% | |
| 17 | WANG Amabel | - | - | - | - | 7% | 46% | 47% |
| 18 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 40% | 12% |
| 19 | KOESTERS Florentine | - | 6% | 28% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 20 | SFINTESCU Emma | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 21 | LI Christina | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 45% | 24% | 2% |
| 22 | COLE Sofia | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 45% | 10% | 1% |
| 23 | HUSSIAN Annabelle | - | 5% | 26% | 47% | 20% | 2% | |
| 24 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | - | - | 4% | 23% | 43% | 26% | 4% |
| 25 | WU Charlotte | 4% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 7% | - | - |
| 26 | ZELDIN Nadia | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 43% | 42% |
| 27 | STEWART Isla | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | YOUM Amelia | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 29 | CHAN Kaitlyn | 4% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
| 30 | HOLLIS Priscillia | 1% | 17% | 46% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 31 | HUDSON Sophie | 14% | 52% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 32 | ZHU Ella | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 46% | 17% | 2% |
| 33 | GOMEZ Sofia | 24% | 47% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 34 | KANDALAFT Emma | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 35 | BAULIN Zoya | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 36 | FEDER Acadia | - | 4% | 25% | 47% | 22% | 2% | - |
| 37 | SUN Erin | 3% | 25% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | HOU Xu | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | BROWN Katelyn | 19% | 47% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 40 | FAN Melody | 4% | 25% | 44% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | CAVANAGH Emma | 2% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 42 | CULLEN Serena | 10% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | KIM Claire | 7% | 32% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | DINAR Julia | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - | - |
| 45 | MCCORMICK Ella | 49% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 46 | WAN Celine | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 47 | LENZ Phoebe | 35% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 48 | BALIN Sophia | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | VACCARO Lillian | 29% | 46% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 50 | SONG Sarah | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | DONG Katelyn | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | JIANG Doris | 19% | 49% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 53 | PAEK Mila | 24% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | LOBO Sophie | 42% | 43% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | SEO Celine | 64% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.