Factory 220 - Passaic, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MCSHERRY Ava | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% |
| 2 | LI Han (Helina) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 74% |
| 3 | TSIMIKLIS Aphrodite | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 54% |
| 3 | CAO Amelie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% | 2% |
| 5 | MCSHERRY Kayla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 31% | |
| 6 | EYER Brooke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 18% |
| 6 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 59% |
| 8 | LI Savannah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 8% |
| 9 | LI Joy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 19% |
| 10 | PEVZNER Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% |
| 11 | KAPRAN Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 35% |
| 12 | DE CASTRO Kai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 49% | 10% |
| 13 | OLAWOYE Jadesola | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | 11% | 1% |
| 14 | KRAHE Annika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% | 3% |
| 15 | ROBERTS Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% | 6% |
| 16 | MCFARLANE Asha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 37% | |
| 17 | WANG Amabel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 47% |
| 18 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 12% |
| 19 | KOESTERS Florentine | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 20 | SFINTESCU Emma | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 11% | 1% |
| 21 | LI Christina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 27% | 2% |
| 22 | COLE Sofia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | 11% | 1% |
| 23 | HUSSIAN Annabelle | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 22% | 2% | |
| 24 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 30% | 4% |
| 25 | WU Charlotte | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 7% | - | - |
| 26 | ZELDIN Nadia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 42% |
| 27 | STEWART Isla | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | YOUM Amelia | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | CHAN Kaitlyn | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 7% | - | - |
| 30 | HOLLIS Priscillia | 100% | 99% | 82% | 36% | 6% | - | - |
| 31 | HUDSON Sophie | 100% | 86% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 32 | ZHU Ella | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 19% | 2% |
| 33 | GOMEZ Sofia | 100% | 76% | 29% | 4% | - | - | |
| 34 | KANDALAFT Emma | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
| 35 | BAULIN Zoya | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% | - |
| 36 | FEDER Acadia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 24% | 2% | - |
| 37 | SUN Erin | 100% | 97% | 72% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | HOU Xu | 100% | 90% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | BROWN Katelyn | 100% | 81% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 40 | FAN Melody | 100% | 96% | 71% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | CAVANAGH Emma | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 42 | CULLEN Serena | 100% | 90% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | KIM Claire | 100% | 93% | 61% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | DINAR Julia | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
| 45 | MCCORMICK Ella | 100% | 51% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 46 | WAN Celine | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 47 | LENZ Phoebe | 100% | 65% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 48 | BALIN Sophia | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | VACCARO Lillian | 100% | 71% | 25% | 3% | - | - | |
| 50 | SONG Sarah | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | DONG Katelyn | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | JIANG Doris | 100% | 81% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 53 | PAEK Mila | 100% | 76% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | LOBO Sophie | 100% | 58% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | SEO Celine | 100% | 36% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.