Factory 220 - Passaic, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JOO Sara | - | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 80% | 
| 2 | XING Melly | - | - | - | 6% | 37% | 56% | |
| 3 | CHAN Jolene | - | - | - | 5% | 34% | 60% | |
| 3 | ZHU Alivia | - | - | 3% | 17% | 45% | 35% | |
| 5 | LU Sophia | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | < 1% | 
| 6 | LIN Zhishan | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% | 
| 7 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 46% | 23% | |
| 8 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 51% | 16% | |
| 9 | MURPHY Genevieve | - | - | 1% | 10% | 47% | 42% | |
| 10 | PAEK Ellie | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | - | 
| 11 | ZHENG Annalyn | - | - | 1% | 12% | 51% | 36% | |
| 12 | WANG Joann | - | - | 5% | 28% | 50% | 17% | |
| 13 | LIANG Jasmine | 2% | 14% | 38% | 38% | 8% | 1% | |
| 14 | HEMPHILL Mia | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% | 
| 15 | DONG Audrey | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 1% | 
| 16 | KIM Lael | 3% | 19% | 44% | 29% | 5% | - | |
| 17 | DOMINIK Eliana | 2% | 14% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | 
| 18 | POONIA Akira | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 19 | LE Minnie | 1% | 9% | 33% | 42% | 14% | 1% | |
| 20 | REILLY Carys | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% | 
| 21 | GOMEZ Amelia | 7% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | 
| 22 | JIN Emily | 30% | 46% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 23 | LEVITE Lilliana | 20% | 41% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | NIVAS Tvisha | 12% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | CLOUD Chrystie | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | ZELDIN Nina | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | KOESTERS Cecilie | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% | 
| 28 | LEE Gretchen | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | - | 
| 29 | ZHU Alicia | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | WANG Michelle | 3% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 31 | LI Beatrice | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
| 32 | CLOUD Cailynn | 12% | 39% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | CHOUDRY Charlotte | 14% | 39% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - | 
| 34 | DEVISETTY Anjali | 8% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | KAUR Harjas | 28% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 36 | CHEN Quianna | 29% | 48% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 37 | NAUTIYAL Asha | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - | 
| 37 | PATEL Tiana | 41% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - | 
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.