Durham, NC - Durham, NC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
2 | TANG Annie L. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 47% | 32% |
3 | KALRA Himani V. | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
3 | WU Erica L. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
5 | CHEN Xinyan | 2% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
6 | BHATTACHARJEE Rhea | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
7 | JULIEN Michelle | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% | |
8 | DHAR Aamina | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
9 | NI Sharon | - | 14% | 41% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
10 | KALRA Siya L. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
11 | NYSTROM Sofia C. | 2% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
12 | HU Allison C. | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
13 | HOVERMAN Hannah A. | 18% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
14 | LU Amy | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
15 | CANSECO Laura K. | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 19% | |
16 | TUCKER Iman R. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
17 | TODD Phoebe | 29% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | |
18 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 48% | 31% |
19 | SCHIKORE Anna M. | 3% | 39% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - |
20 | SHI Cathleen | - | 10% | 37% | 40% | 13% | 1% |
21 | CONGIUSTA Aelex | 51% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
22 | LIAO Siwen | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
23 | ELDER Rhiannon C. | 87% | 12% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.