Durham, NC - Durham, NC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
| 2 | TANG Annie L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 32% |
| 3 | KALRA Himani V. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
| 3 | WU Erica L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% |
| 5 | CHEN Xinyan | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 6 | BHATTACHARJEE Rhea | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
| 7 | JULIEN Michelle | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 8% | |
| 8 | DHAR Aamina | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 9 | NI Sharon | 100% | 100% | 86% | 44% | 10% | 1% |
| 10 | KALRA Siya L. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
| 11 | NYSTROM Sofia C. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
| 12 | HU Allison C. | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 13 | HOVERMAN Hannah A. | 100% | 82% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
| 14 | LU Amy | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 15 | CANSECO Laura K. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% | |
| 16 | TUCKER Iman R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 17 | TODD Phoebe | 100% | 71% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 18 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 31% |
| 19 | SCHIKORE Anna M. | 100% | 97% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 20 | SHI Cathleen | 100% | 100% | 90% | 54% | 14% | 1% |
| 21 | CONGIUSTA Aelex | 100% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 22 | LIAO Siwen | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
| 23 | ELDER Rhiannon C. | 100% | 13% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.