Salle Auriol Seattle - Seattle, WA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | ELSAYED Ahmed | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 6.0 | 6 | - |
2 | HSU Shiou Tian | D V D V V D | V V V V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
3 | WESTPHAL David R. | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
3 | HAMZA Tudor | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
5 | LARSEN Samuel F. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
6 | MALAHE Michael | V V D V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
7 | MATHES Caleb | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
8 | SPROWLES Cameron D. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
9 | WU Alistair | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
10 | DONDISCH Ilan | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
11 | LUEDECKE Myles A. | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
12 | DU SHUNYU K. | V V D V D V | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
13 | CARLSON Jesse | D V V D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
14 | KROGH Daniel (Dan) M. | D V D V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
15 | WEISE Eli S. | V V V D D V | V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
16 | BREILING Nikki | D V V D V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
17 | DESSAUER Tobyn M. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
18 | SUVOROV Yuly | V V D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
19 | WANG Aaron | V V V V V D | V D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
20 | SHI William | D V V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
21 | LI Timothy | V V V D V | V D | 1.5 | 4 | +2.5 |
22 | KILUK Andrew | V V D V V D | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
23 | TSAI Oscar | D V V V D V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
24 | ROBERTS Peter | V V V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
25 | VARNEY John R. | V D V V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
26 | CRANOR Erich L. | D V D V V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
27 | DEMPSEY Connor | D D V D V V | V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
28 | MYRAH Devin | V D V D V D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
29 | GOWDA Suyog | V V D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
30 | KIM Teo | V D V D D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
31 | PARKEY Jack O. | D V D V D D | V D | 4.4 | 2 | -2.4 |
31 | LEWIS Michael | D V D D V D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
33 | RAMIREZ Hunter | D V V V V D | D | 0.7 | 4 | +3.3 |
34 | OLSON Kevin | V V V D V D | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
35 | BRACCO Cameron | D V V V D | D | 0.7 | 3 | +2.3 |
36 | REED David | V D V D D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
37 | ST.CLAIRE-KING Tenzin | V D V D D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
38 | DAN Rex | V V D D V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
39 | WAI Andreas | D D V D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
40 | TOYOFUKU Ethan | D D V D D V | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
41 | TANG Zheng | D V V D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
42 | DUNNING Kurt R. | D V D D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
43 | BACON Corban | V D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
44 | MONTGOMERY Elliot | D D D V V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
45 | SPERANZA John | D V D D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
46 | JONES Colby | D D D V D V | D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
47 | HARRISKING Benjamin | V D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
48 | BREILING Sebastian | D D V V D D | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
49 | KRYLTSOV Greg | D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
50 | WEGENER Soren | V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
51 | PAGE Aaron M. | D D V D D D | D | 4.2 | 1 | -3.2 |
52 | SILKEY Jason | V D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
52 | BIROAN Chaz | D D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
54 | PENG Gregory | D D V D D D | D | 3.7 | 1 | -2.7 |
55 | KLEIN Johannes | D D D D D V | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
56 | STOCK Jordan | D D V D D D | D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
57 | MEHROTRA Dhruv | V D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
58 | GILMORE Nik | D D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
59 | SRINIVASAN Sanat Ram | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
59 | CASONI Calder | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
61 | RAMIREZ Tristan | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
62 | DAN Chuntao | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.