Fike Recreation Center - Piedmont, SC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MODULLA Yathin R. | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 53% | 20% |
| 2 | DECKER Carlton | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 3 | EDGECOMB Michael J. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
| 3 | BEACH Nicholas | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 44% | 40% |
| 5 | RACHEL Dylan | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 42% | 50% |
| 6 | ARZT Nicholas | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 7 | LABROZZI Aidan | - | - | - | 5% | 27% | 48% | 19% |
| 8 | PAVLINEC John (Jack) C. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 9 | POBIS Chandler R. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 48% |
| 10 | IBANEZ Julien | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 48% |
| 11 | THOMPSON Daniel M. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 47% | 32% |
| 12 | STEVENS James F. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 43% | 17% |
| 13 | KRIEGER Jack | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% | |
| 14 | VILLANI Henry M. | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 53% | 26% |
| 15 | HICKS Matthew | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 16 | TUCKER Evan | 5% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - | - |
| 17 | PELLI Madeleine | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 18 | THOMPSON Conner | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 19 | ROHDE Nathan | - | 4% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 4% | - |
| 20 | FERRARO Nicholas | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 21 | HINSON Trey | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 22 | ASBY Will | 5% | 25% | 41% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 23 | PATEL Divyam | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 24 | HICKS Joseph | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 25 | OLENDER Lexi | 8% | 26% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 2% | - |
| 26 | NAMIREDDY Ruthvik | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | GEISSLER Maximilian | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 28 | DING Tommy | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 29 | LABROZZI Quinn | 36% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 30 | KINSELLA John | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 31 | STEELE Jeff | 23% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | TYMOFIEIEVA Arina | 41% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 33 | BISEN Aryaman | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 34 | HAGEN Samuel | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | MACLEOD Zion | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | CATES Georgia | 48% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 37 | ARMES Maggie | 5% | 39% | 41% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | GREBENTSOV Tony | 4% | 25% | 44% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | FRANKUM Nate | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 40 | SEARS SARAH | 11% | 40% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | NEWTON Tal | 3% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 8% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.