Fike Recreation Center - Piedmont, SC, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MODULLA Yathin R. | V V D V V V | V V V V V | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 2 | DECKER Carlton | D D V V V D | V V V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 3 | EDGECOMB Michael J. | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 3 | BEACH Nicholas | V D V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 5 | RACHEL Dylan | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 6 | ARZT Nicholas | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 7 | LABROZZI Aidan | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 8 | PAVLINEC John (Jack) C. | D V D V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 9 | POBIS Chandler R. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 10 | IBANEZ Julien | V V V V V V | V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 11 | THOMPSON Daniel M. | V D V V V V | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 12 | STEVENS James F. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 13 | KRIEGER Jack | D V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 14 | VILLANI Henry M. | V D D V V V | V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 15 | HICKS Matthew | D V D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 16 | TUCKER Evan | D V V V D V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 17 | PELLI Madeleine | V V D V V D | D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 18 | THOMPSON Conner | V D V D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 19 | ROHDE Nathan | D V V D D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 20 | FERRARO Nicholas | D D V V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 21 | HINSON Trey | V V D D D V | D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 22 | ASBY Will | V V D D V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 23 | PATEL Divyam | V V V D D D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 24 | HICKS Joseph | V V D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 25 | OLENDER Lexi | D V D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 26 | NAMIREDDY Ruthvik | D D V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 27 | GEISSLER Maximilian | V V D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 28 | DING Tommy | D D D D V V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 29 | LABROZZI Quinn | D V D D V D | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 30 | KINSELLA John | V D D D D | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 31 | STEELE Jeff | D V D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 32 | TYMOFIEIEVA Arina | D D D D D D | V D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 33 | BISEN Aryaman | D D V V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 34 | HAGEN Samuel | D V D D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 35 | MACLEOD Zion | D D V V D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 36 | CATES Georgia | D V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 37 | ARMES Maggie | D D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 38 | GREBENTSOV Tony | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 39 | FRANKUM Nate | D D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
| 40 | SEARS SARAH | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 41 | NEWTON Tal | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.