Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 2 | YANG Emma | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% |
| 3 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 47% | 40% |
| 3 | YANG Iris | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
| 5 | LEE Lavender | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 52% |
| 6 | TSIMIKLIS Aphrodite | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 4% |
| 7 | JOO Natalie | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 8 | RENTON Samantha | - | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 22% | 3% |
| 9 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 48% | 33% |
| 10 | LI Han (Helina) | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 14% | 1% |
| 11 | FENG Grace | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
| 12 | SHEN Emilia | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 40% | 27% |
| 13 | KOPYLTSOVA Elizaveta | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 46% | 27% |
| 14 | CHO Emily (Euran) | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 50% | 32% |
| 15 | SHIM Grace J. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 11% |
| 16 | WANG Joanna | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
| 17 | KIM Claire | - | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 18 | HORSLEY Asherah | - | - | - | - | 3% | 29% | 68% |
| 19 | BING Charlotte | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 20 | WANG DINA C. | 1% | 13% | 37% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 21 | ZELDIN Nadia | - | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 22 | WANG Amabel | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
| 23 | SHENG Katherine | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 24 | MCFARLANE Asha | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 25 | KAPRAN Anastasia | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 3% |
| 26 | CAO Amelie | 3% | 23% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 27 | FENG Audrey | - | - | 5% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 4% |
| 28 | PEVZNER Nicole | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 3% |
| 29 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | - | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 5% |
| 30 | YU Jane | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 31 | YIN Chloe | 4% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | LI Eleanor | - | 2% | 19% | 45% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 33 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% |
| 34 | FIELD Julianna | - | - | 5% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 4% |
| 35 | CHEN Renee | - | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 48% | 11% |
| 36 | SHMAY Anastasia | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 37 | BERGEL Daphne | 3% | 20% | 46% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 38 | WANG Carol | - | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 39 | FIELD Elizabeth | 2% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 40 | HARRIS Julia | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 41 | COLE Sofia | 25% | 51% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 42 | ELHUSSEINY Rana | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 43 | WEI Angela | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 44 | MEYER Claudia | 2% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 45 | ZHAO Sinuo | 15% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | FELLMAN Sara | 7% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | RECKLING Kathleen A. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 48 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | 3% | 29% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 48 | SHICK Veronika | 9% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | STEWART Isla | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 51 | YANIV Liya | 24% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | CHEN Sophie | 1% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 53 | SHERLOCK Gabriella | - | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | SFINTESCU Emma | 17% | 42% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | SINGH Evangelina | 26% | 48% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 56 | LAO Sophia | 25% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 57 | PEVZNER Sophia | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 58 | LI Savannah | 24% | 39% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | BERTOLINI Mia | 22% | 44% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 60 | CHUNG Stella | 38% | 46% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 61 | KRUPENKO Sabrina R. | 43% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 62 | FRENZINGER Kate | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 63 | LEVY Zia | 99% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.