Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG DINA C. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 42% | 50% | |
| 2 | LI Savannah | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% | |
| 3 | MURPHY Genevieve | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
| 3 | KRAHE Annika | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 48% | |
| 5 | LI Christina | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 36% | |
| 6 | XING Melly | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 47% | 26% |
| 7 | SHIN Elizabeth | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 49% | |
| 8 | CHUNG Stella | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | JOO Sara | - | - | - | - | 6% | 35% | 59% |
| 10 | SFINTESCU Emma | - | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% |
| 11 | ZHU Alivia | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 45% | 11% |
| 12 | DE CASTRO Kai | - | - | 3% | 20% | 52% | 25% | |
| 13 | ORRINGER Lottie | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 40% |
| 14 | CHOI Cara | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 14% | 1% |
| 15 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 16 | BAULIN Zoya | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 17 | FEDER Acadia | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 20% | 3% |
| 18 | ZHILKOV Anya | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 39% | 10% |
| 19 | CHO Olivia | - | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% |
| 20 | WANG Joann | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 21 | LIN Katherine | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% |
| 22 | ZHAO Olivia | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% |
| 23 | LI Joy | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 25 | LUO lucy | - | 1% | 13% | 39% | 37% | 9% | |
| 26 | EPSTEIN Naomi | - | - | 5% | 24% | 46% | 24% | |
| 27 | CHAN Kaitlyn | 2% | 22% | 43% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 28 | GOODMAN Carden | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 29% | 4% |
| 29 | VO Evelyn | 2% | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 30 | KIRBY Emelie | 5% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 31 | FAN Melody | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | YOUM Amelia | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 33 | ZHU Ella | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 46% | 16% | |
| 34 | XU-FERGUSON Victoria | - | 2% | 19% | 44% | 30% | 5% | |
| 35 | DONG Katelyn | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 36 | ROBERTS Anastasia | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 46% | 33% |
| 37 | MACKINTOSH Quinn | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 38 | MCCLELLAN Florence | 6% | 36% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | BO Iris | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 8% | |
| 40 | KHETPAL Aalia | - | 7% | 37% | 40% | 14% | 1% | |
| 41 | PAEK Mila | 8% | 33% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | LIN Claire | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 21% | 3% | |
| 43 | TEE Cymbeline | 10% | 38% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | CHAN Jolene | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% |
| 45 | KAPUR Vanya | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 46 | HEMPHILL Mia | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 47 | KANDALAFT Emma | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
| 48 | REILLY Carys | 15% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 49 | ELLISON Ingrid | 2% | 19% | 42% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 50 | LU Sophia | 7% | 35% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 51 | SHUTZER Lily | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 18% | 2% | |
| 52 | HUDSON Sophie | 18% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | ZHU Alicia | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 54 | DAVIS Gabriella | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | HUANG Gabrielle | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 56 | LIANG Jasmine | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | WU Charlotte | 11% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 58 | LIAW Audrey | 16% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 59 | GOMEZ Amelia | 13% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 60 | BALIN Sophia | 4% | 30% | 43% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 61 | OTTAVIANO Maris | 1% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 62 | ZELDIN Nina | 3% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
| 63 | KIM Lael | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 64 | PAEK Ellie | 12% | 36% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 65 | CLOUD Chrystie | 19% | 44% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | LOBO Sophie | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 67 | MIN Claire | 77% | 22% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 68 | BENNETT Emi | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 69 | MA Cloris | 22% | 44% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 69 | HURD Alexandra | 53% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 71 | SEO Celine | 51% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 71 | SICHEL-OUTCALT Margaret | < 1% | 8% | 50% | 37% | 5% | - | - |
| 73 | PARK Addison | 39% | 42% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.