Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | WANG-SONG Evan | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 2 | JIANG Ryan | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 80% |
| 3 | FEINBERG James Y. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 3 | CLEARY Owen | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 5 | MOZZER Nolan | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 6 | PAN Anthony | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
| 7 | ROSIELLO Francesco | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 8 | MORI Seneca | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 9 | PETINO Leonardo | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% |
| 10 | ERIKSEN Casey | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 11 | SZCZAPA Lukas | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 47% | 6% |
| 12 | KELLEY Hayden | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
| 13 | SUH Aiden | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% |
| 14 | ZHENG Jason | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 15 | MCMILLAN Jackson V. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 19% |
| 16 | HOLCOMB Liam | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 17 | SKLAR Davida | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
| 18 | BENNETT Nathaniel | 1% | 10% | 34% | 38% | 15% | 2% |
| 19 | KABA Elias | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 17% |
| 20 | CHALLAMEL Hadrien | 1% | 10% | 34% | 41% | 13% | 1% |
| 21 | OTTAVIANO Aaron | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 7% |
| 22 | MANSFIELD Hunter | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
| 23 | SONPAL Winslow | 11% | 36% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 24 | ZHANG Jonathan | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 25 | LI Ray | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
| 26 | MITSCH Aubrey | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 27 | ROBINSON Garrett | 2% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | WHITE Aidan | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 29 | WILLIAMS Gavin | 5% | 27% | 42% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 30 | PARIGIAN Alexander | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 31 | MECHREFE Anthony | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
| 32 | BEAULIEU Edmund | 16% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 33 | RUDIGER George | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | ZHENG Yicheng Will | 19% | 44% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 35 | CHAN Tyler | 13% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 36 | RICHARDS Jack | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | LIU Easun | 81% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | AKEHURST MOORE Ian | 28% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | BOXER Eishan | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 40 | HOLBROOK Joshua | < 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
| 41 | MANN Daniel | 10% | 38% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 42 | CHUKWU Mark | 3% | 22% | 43% | 26% | 6% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.