Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | WANG-SONG Evan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
| 2 | JIANG Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 80% |
| 3 | FEINBERG James Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 24% |
| 3 | CLEARY Owen | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 5 | MOZZER Nolan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 6 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% |
| 7 | ROSIELLO Francesco | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 8 | MORI Seneca | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
| 9 | PETINO Leonardo | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% |
| 10 | ERIKSEN Casey | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 11 | SZCZAPA Lukas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 6% |
| 12 | KELLEY Hayden | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 5% |
| 13 | SUH Aiden | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 7% |
| 14 | ZHENG Jason | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 15 | MCMILLAN Jackson V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% |
| 16 | HOLCOMB Liam | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 17 | SKLAR Davida | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
| 18 | BENNETT Nathaniel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 17% | 2% |
| 19 | KABA Elias | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% |
| 20 | CHALLAMEL Hadrien | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 13% | 1% |
| 21 | OTTAVIANO Aaron | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 7% |
| 22 | MANSFIELD Hunter | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% |
| 23 | SONPAL Winslow | 100% | 89% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 24 | ZHANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 25 | LI Ray | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 26 | MITSCH Aubrey | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 27 | ROBINSON Garrett | 100% | 98% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 28 | WHITE Aidan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
| 29 | WILLIAMS Gavin | 100% | 95% | 67% | 25% | 3% | - |
| 30 | PARIGIAN Alexander | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 31 | MECHREFE Anthony | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
| 32 | BEAULIEU Edmund | 100% | 84% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 33 | RUDIGER George | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | ZHENG Yicheng Will | 100% | 81% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | CHAN Tyler | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 36 | RICHARDS Jack | 100% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | LIU Easun | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | AKEHURST MOORE Ian | 100% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | BOXER Eishan | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 40 | HOLBROOK Joshua | 100% | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 41 | MANN Daniel | 100% | 90% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 42 | CHUKWU Mark | 100% | 97% | 75% | 32% | 6% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.