French Field House - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CULLIVAN Justice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 49% |
| 2 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | |
| 3 | HUTH Mitchell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 80% |
| 3 | MION Lorenzo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 43% |
| 5 | BAGDÁNY Albert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% |
| 6 | LAHUNOU Uladzislau | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 35% |
| 7 | LI Wangjie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% |
| 8 | FREEDMAN Samuel E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | 10% |
| 9 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% |
| 10 | BURBERRY Alan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 12% |
| 11 | OZAWA Taishi | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | 6% | - |
| 12 | BOYKO Miles | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 26% | 2% |
| 13 | TSAO Lukas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% |
| 14 | ALLEN Henry G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 40% | 7% |
| 14 | ZHENG Marcus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% | 2% |
| 16 | LEUNG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | 6% |
| 17 | STRUGAR Marcus A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 16% | 1% |
| 18 | MCISAAC Finn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 19 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 17% | |
| 20 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% |
| 21 | HICKEY Connor | 100% | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 22 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% | 9% |
| 23 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 56% | 15% | 1% |
| 24 | KUE Temujin | 100% | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 25 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | 3% |
| 26 | BONSTEEL Max K. | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 27 | HAMILTON Brock B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | 3% | - |
| 28 | SORRENTINO Salvatore | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 29 | SUN Henry | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | ARATA Connor | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 31 | MUNDY Ezra | 100% | 82% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | HABBOUB Qusai | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
| 33 | BLAKEMAN Michael J. | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | GNEUHS Sam | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 18% | 1% | - |
| 35 | ZHAO Zhiyong | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 8% | - |
| 36 | HREHOCIK Matthew | 100% | 85% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | XIE Ethan | 100% | 70% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | DUNLAP Ian | 100% | 78% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | KABARITI Karim | 100% | 95% | 60% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | BATES Austin | 100% | 98% | 76% | 33% | 6% | - | - |
| 41 | DEPP Edward | 100% | 60% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 42 | KEMNITZER John | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 43 | SMITH Erick | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 44 | SELJAN Matt | 100% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | METZ Evan | 100% | 75% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 46 | DENMAN Matthew L. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 6% | - | - |
| 47 | MILLER Jonathan | 100% | 68% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 48 | RYAN Nash | 100% | 89% | 47% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 49 | CHEN Kedwin | 100% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 49 | MCERLEAN Liam | 100% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 49 | MUMFORD Josh | 100% | 91% | 57% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | LEACH Kai | 100% | 90% | 55% | 16% | 1% | - | |
| 53 | AHLER Quin | 100% | 69% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | LEVINE Colby | 100% | 93% | 52% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | CANNON Zachary | 100% | 89% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.