Greater Philadelphia Expo Center - Hall C - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TSIMIKLIS aphrodite | - | - | - | - | 6% | 94% | |
| 2 | SIROTA Francis | - | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 85% |
| 3 | ZHU Alivia | - | - | 1% | 10% | 48% | 41% | |
| 3 | WANG Joann | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | |
| 5 | EPSTEIN Naomi | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
| 6 | CHAN Jolene | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% | |
| 7 | DONG Katelyn | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 8 | PHAN Logan | 2% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | |
| 9 | LIN Claire | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% | |
| 10 | FEDER Acadia | - | - | 1% | 12% | 50% | 37% | |
| 11 | HUANG Gabrielle | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% | - | |
| 12 | SINGH Evangelina | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 23% |
| 13 | CHAN Kaitlyn | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% |
| 14 | LU Sophia | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 15 | HOLLIS Priscillia | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | |
| 16 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
| 17 | ZHENG Annalyn | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 21% |
| 18 | ELLISON Ingrid | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 22% | - | |
| 19 | GOMEZ Amelia | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 20 | BENTLEY Amelia | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 20 | HOU Xu | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 22 | REILLY Carys | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | CLOUD Chrystie | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 24 | VO Evelyn | 6% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 25 | XU-FERGUSON Victoria | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | |
| 26 | LE Minnie | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 27 | JIN Emily | 41% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 28 | BROWN Katelyn | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 29 | KIM Lael | 8% | 33% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | MA Cloris | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 32 | COUAILLIER Lou | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | |
| 33 | LIANG Jasmine | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 34 | ZAMLYNNY Victoria | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | - |
| 34 | KAPUR Vanya | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | - |
| 36 | VUONG Nguyen | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | - | |
| 37 | ZHU Alicia | 8% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | TEE Cymbeline | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 39 | BALIN Sophia | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 40 | ZUCKER Eleanor | 25% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | LOBO Sophie | 16% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | HONG Mabel | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% | |
| 43 | AKSAKAL Ela | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 44 | CULLEN Serena | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | WEINER Charlotte | 16% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | KAGAN Natalie | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.