Greater Philadelphia Expo Center - Hall C - Oaks, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MCDONALD Finn | D V V V D D | V V V V V V | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 2 | PORTER Dupree | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 3 | FENG Brendan | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 3 | CLARK Aram | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 5 | JI Johnson | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 6 | SHEYNZON Benjamin | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 7 | WANG Theodore | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 8 | MERMEGAS Alexander | V V V V V D | V V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 9 | NAYAGAM Nishant | D V V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 10 | LIEBOWITZ Carson | V D V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 11 | BALE ATMAN | V V D V V D | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 12 | SHAPIRO Leo | V V D V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 13 | CHIANG Ethan | V D V V V D | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 14 | STEWART Samuel | V V D D V V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 15 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | V D V D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 16 | WASCO Andrew | V D D D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 17 | LEVY Jack | V V V V V | D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 18 | LIU Ryan | D V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 19 | ROMBERG Sam | V V V D D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 20 | CONNOLLY Edward Bud | D D V V V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 21 | DAYAMA Ronak | V V V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 22 | CAI Chengtian | D V V V D V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 23 | LEE Ryan | V V D V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 24 | MIAO Heqi | V V D D D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 25 | DE SIENA Salvatore | D V V D V D | V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 26 | SAYAR Luke | D D V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 27 | CHANG Timothy | V D V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 28 | ZHANG Simon | V V D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 29 | LEIGH Brayden | D V D D V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 30 | ZWAKA Jonas | V V V D D D | V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 31 | VISH Manyu | V D D D V D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 32 | LIEU Nicholas | D D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 33 | HOUPT Lucas | V D V D V V | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 34 | CAI Chengyuan | D V V D D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 35 | DEMERS Bodhi | D D V D V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 36 | FREILICH Harrison | V D V D V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 37 | TITOV Zachary | D V D V V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 38 | BENNETT Lachlan | D V D V D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 39 | SONG Ryan | V D D V V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 40 | HOWARTH Hayes | V D V V D D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 41 | YANG Byron | D V D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 42 | GRIFFIN Sid | V D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 43 | AKSAKAL Deniz | D D V D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 44 | TASIKAS Peter | D D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 44 | JIN Yubo | D V D D D D | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 46 | WU Vincent | D D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 47 | LI Kent | D D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 48 | PARROCO Andrew | D D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 49 | JARRETT Benjamin | D D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 50 | LI Sebastian | D D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 51 | ZAY Elijah | D D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 51 | SONG Jerry | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 53 | SHAW Micah | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 54 | LEE SungYup | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 54 | KRISHNAN Arjun | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.