Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PARK Lauren | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 74% |
| 2 | KENSICKI Phoebe | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 3 | ZHAN Catherine | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 10% | |
| 3 | MAHAPATRA Alisha | - | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 5 | CHENG Audrey | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 6 | WANG Doreen | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 7 | SOE Hayleigh | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 59% |
| 8 | QIAO Lori-Ann | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
| 9 | DESAI Zoya | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 24% |
| 10 | CHEN Summer | - | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 33% | 7% |
| 11 | YUNG Zoe | - | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 37% | 5% |
| 12 | ZHANG Hannah | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% | |
| 13 | FU Joy | - | 3% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 7% | |
| 14 | KIM Rylie | 1% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 15 | PAWAR Sanvi | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 16 | LI Annabelle | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 43% | 20% | 1% |
| 17 | CHUNG Katie | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
| 18 | HOM Emma | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 19 | NICOLETTI Thea | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 16% | |
| 20 | KENT Audrey | 2% | 15% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 21 | KHANAL Sarah | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 5% |
| 22 | SHU Kayla | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 23 | CHOI Jian | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 46% | 30% |
| 24 | SAIFEE Zahra | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 29% | 5% |
| 25 | PEROJO Angie | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 26 | FAN Lauren | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | GOWDA Siyona | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 28 | TIAN Claire | 1% | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 29 | SAIFEE Sakina | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 38% | 30% | 5% |
| 30 | GOWDA Adisha | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 31 | DEJOY Leilah | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 32 | LI Claire | 4% | 30% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | ZHOU athena | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 34 | CAO Alexandra | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 35 | ZHANG Annabelle | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% | |
| 36 | KENZHEBULATOVA Sara | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 37 | BANDZELADZE Emma | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 38 | MARENITCH Kara | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 38 | CHEUNG Carabelle | 4% | 30% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | VALOUEVA Katerina | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 41 | GU Ava | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | ARCE BASURCO Juliana | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 43 | GUO Jianing | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | ALEKSANDROVA Mira | 5% | 27% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | ZEE Bella | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 46 | CHEN Chloe | 10% | 34% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | POON Taylor | 12% | 41% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | JOE Everly | 35% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 49 | FU Angela | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 50 | SHIN Ellie | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 51 | YOU Mina | 12% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | YI Helen | 10% | 40% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | YUEN Hannah | 49% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | LIU Celia | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 55 | ZHANG Anthea Jia Jia | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
| 56 | SU Hermione Su | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | SUTTON Sadie | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 58 | STOCK Nina | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 59 | SUN Zoey | 25% | 47% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 60 | CHOI Mackenzie | 49% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.