Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PARK Lauren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 74% |
2 | KENSICKI Phoebe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% |
3 | ZHAN Catherine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 10% | |
3 | MAHAPATRA Alisha | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
5 | CHENG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
6 | WANG Doreen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
7 | SOE Hayleigh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
8 | QIAO Lori-Ann | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% | |
9 | DESAI Zoya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% |
10 | CHEN Summer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 7% |
11 | YUNG Zoe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | 5% |
12 | ZHANG Hannah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 36% | |
13 | FU Joy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 7% | |
14 | KIM Rylie | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
15 | PAWAR Sanvi | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
16 | LI Annabelle | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | 1% |
17 | CHUNG Katie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
18 | HOM Emma | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
19 | NICOLETTI Thea | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 16% | |
20 | KENT Audrey | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
21 | KHANAL Sarah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 5% |
22 | SHU Kayla | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
23 | CHOI Jian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 30% |
24 | SAIFEE Zahra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | 5% |
25 | PEROJO Angie | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
26 | FAN Lauren | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
27 | GOWDA Siyona | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
28 | TIAN Claire | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
29 | SAIFEE Sakina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 5% |
30 | GOWDA Adisha | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 6% | - |
31 | DEJOY Leilah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 33% | 6% | - |
32 | LI Claire | 100% | 96% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
33 | ZHOU athena | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
34 | CAO Alexandra | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
35 | ZHANG Annabelle | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% | |
36 | KENZHEBULATOVA Sara | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
37 | BANDZELADZE Emma | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 2% |
38 | MARENITCH Kara | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
38 | CHEUNG Carabelle | 100% | 96% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
40 | VALOUEVA Katerina | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
41 | GU Ava | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
42 | ARCE BASURCO Juliana | 100% | 95% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
43 | GUO Jianing | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
44 | ALEKSANDROVA Mira | 100% | 95% | 68% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
45 | ZEE Bella | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
46 | CHEN Chloe | 100% | 90% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
47 | POON Taylor | 100% | 88% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
48 | JOE Everly | 100% | 65% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
49 | FU Angela | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
50 | SHIN Ellie | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
51 | YOU Mina | 100% | 88% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
52 | YI Helen | 100% | 90% | 50% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
53 | YUEN Hannah | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
54 | LIU Celia | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
55 | ZHANG Anthea Jia Jia | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
56 | SU Hermione Su | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | |
57 | SUTTON Sadie | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
58 | STOCK Nina | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
59 | SUN Zoey | 100% | 75% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
60 | CHOI Mackenzie | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.