Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LOZANO Veyron Jericho | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% |
| 2 | YE Jerry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 41% | |
| 3 | HONG Edwin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% | |
| 3 | TANG Brayden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 5 | GUDIMETLA Siddhanth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 19% |
| 6 | CROWDER Job Christoph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% | 2% |
| 7 | WANG sicheng | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 31% | |
| 8 | SANCHEZ MARTINEZ Victor Noel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 4% |
| 9 | HE Ian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% | |
| 10 | YEE Colin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 11 | TSUI Raedyn Ho Hin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 29% |
| 12 | MA Justin | 100% | 100% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 13 | YUNG Brandon | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% | |
| 14 | PARK Kaiden | 100% | 100% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 15 | JEON Joohun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 31% | 5% |
| 16 | LOPES-EASON Liam James | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 17 | LEONG Wilson Hua | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
| 18 | CHEN Owen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% | |
| 19 | HUANG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 39% | |
| 20 | ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 30% | 5% | |
| 21 | GUO Austin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 22% | |
| 22 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 56% | 18% | |
| 23 | FU Owen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 20% | 2% |
| 24 | FOO Kingston | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 25 | TSUI Kaylan Ho Sen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% | |
| 26 | OH Kepler | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 27 | KWONG Colin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 28 | WANG Eason | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 3% | |
| 29 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% | - |
| 30 | JIN Yucheng | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
| 31 | WONG Connor | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 1% | |
| 32 | LI Jake | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 33 | CHEUNG Henry | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | 15% | 1% | |
| 34 | CABATO Luca | 100% | 96% | 68% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | TEJAKUSUMA Eric | 100% | 93% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 36 | KAJITA Grayson | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 37 | TROYANKER Makar | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 38 | LEE Colin | 100% | 98% | 76% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 39 | YAN Aaron | 100% | 98% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 40 | GOURLEY Jack | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 41 | CAO Benjamin | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 42 | FALCONE Mateo | 100% | 85% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | GOERDEL Hitchens | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | |
| 44 | SHA Lambor（Laien) | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | LEE Juneau | 100% | 95% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 45 | PICACHE Crockett | 100% | 93% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | LI Lief | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 48 | WANG Andy | 100% | 66% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 49 | NGO Lincoln | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 50 | CHENG Alvin | 100% | 100% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 51 | LIN Dylan | 100% | 97% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 52 | LEE Joshua | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 53 | ZHENG Michael | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 54 | SURIANO Dominic | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 55 | LIU Kingston | 100% | 69% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
| 56 | MKHIZE-SHAW Senzo | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 56 | KIM Noah | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | LU David | 100% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.