Golisano Training Center at Nazareth University - Rochester, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHAO Olivia | - | - | - | - | 6% | 38% | 56% |
2 | XING Melly | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 61% | 16% |
3 | MURPHY Genevieve | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% |
3 | LIU Qianchen E. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 40% | 51% |
5 | JOO Sara | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 48% | 19% |
6 | WEN Cynthia | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
7 | MALIK Manha | - | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 39% | 23% |
8 | BYK Karalina | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
9 | KOU Elisha | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 39% | 19% |
10 | YANG Olivia | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 16% | |
11 | ZHENG Annalyn | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 19% |
12 | HAFEZ Sahar | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
13 | LIU Bella | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 1% |
14 | GENG Emma | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
15 | DONG Audrey | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
16 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
17 | KHETPAL Aalia | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
18 | CHAN Jolene | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
19 | KIM Yuna | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
20 | WANG Joann | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
21 | SON Ayoung | - | - | - | 5% | 28% | 49% | 18% |
22 | LIN Claire | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
23 | ZHANG Selina | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% | |
24 | CHAN Hailey | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
25 | PARK Hannah | - | - | 3% | 20% | 50% | 24% | 3% |
26 | XU Charlene | - | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
27 | MA Sophia | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | |
28 | CHAN Jaclyn | 6% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
29 | LUO lucy | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
30 | ZHANG Priscilla | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - |
31 | HEMPHILL Mia | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
32 | CHEN Aimee | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
33 | REILLY Carys | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
34 | FAROOQI Eliora | 2% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% | - |
35 | KUANG Bella | - | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
36 | LU Sophia | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
37 | VO Evelyn | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
39 | KIM Lael | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
40 | HUANG Rosalyn | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
41 | HUANG Gabrielle | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
42 | LEE Isabella | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
43 | HUANG Emma | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
44 | KOESTERS Cecilie | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
45 | WEN Lillian | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 5% | - |
46 | FANG Yining | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
47 | MCCLAIN Madison | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
48 | MILLER Anna | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
49 | SMART Athena | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
50 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
51 | FENG Claire | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
52 | HUANG Jiayu | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
53 | CREECH Emily | 1% | 16% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
54 | GONZALEZ Lauren | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
55 | PAN Nina | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
56 | REN Luna Siyi | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
57 | CULLIVAN Elise | 10% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
58 | WANG Sally | 12% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
59 | LI Aiyu | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
60 | JU Victoria | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
61 | LI Beatrice | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
61 | KANASZ Peyton | 21% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
63 | KLINGER Isabel | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
64 | CHENG Aaralyne | 1% | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
65 | MOORE Sisipho (Talia) | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
66 | ZHOU Jennifer | 1% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
67 | WANG Kelly | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | - | - | |
68 | SEO Grace | 19% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
69 | YU Angelina | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.