Canlan Sports - Libertyville - Libertyville, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Christopher T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 25% |
| 2 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 29% |
| 3 | BAILEY William F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
| 3 | HOWLAND Jonas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 22% |
| 5 | SENIC Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 73% | 23% |
| 6 | WONG Evan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
| 7 | ARAVINDAKSHA Ayaan | 100% | 98% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 8 | FANG Haoyu | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 9 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 31% |
| 10 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
| 11 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 59% | 3% |
| 12 | MCISAAC Finn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% |
| 13 | ASHIDA Tomoaki | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
| 14 | CHUANG Oscar | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 13% | |
| 15 | LEUNG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% | |
| 16 | XU Dinghui Ryan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | MORA Johan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 19% |
| 18 | LEE Benjamin H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% |
| 19 | TOEWS Jackson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 20 | JU Alexander (Alex) Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 51% |
| 21 | VANOYEN Dominick | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% | 2% |
| 22 | HOLLIDAY Christopher Mansfield-Scott | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
| 23 | PAI Dong-Ying | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
| 24 | ARATA Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 25% | 2% |
| 25 | HICKEY Connor | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 26 | ZHANG Jacob | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | |
| 27 | SOYSKI Harrison Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 20% |
| 27 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 76% | 27% |
| 29 | GE Felix Fei | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 13% | - |
| 30 | ZINSER James | 100% | 99% | 83% | 34% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | RUBY Asher | 100% | 96% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | LI Andy | 100% | 96% | 66% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 33 | ZHENG Marcus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 19% |
| 34 | MAVANI Krishna | 100% | 100% | 91% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 35 | KATWAN Adam A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 8% |
| 36 | LU Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 24% | 3% |
| 37 | HEYBOER Jason | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 38 | MILLER Douglas S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 30% |
| 39 | HONG Derek | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 24% | 3% | - |
| 40 | CAO Leon M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 72% | 23% |
| 41 | SHI Boris | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 42 | GNEUHS Sam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
| 43 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 12% |
| 44 | MARTIN William | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
| 45 | NAIDL Josiah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 46 | RONE Tosan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 28% | 4% |
| 47 | SORRENTINO Salvatore | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 48 | HERRERA Xavier | 100% | 92% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | MCCONKEY Tristan | 100% | 95% | 68% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | FLANAGAN James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 12% |
| 51 | TAN Xinlai | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | |
| 52 | SINHA Verdhaan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 37% | 7% | |
| 53 | DAVIS Benjamin | 100% | 67% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 54 | WILEY Conor | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 55 | KUE Temujin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 14% | 1% |
| 56 | DURHAM Porter | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 56 | KAGAN Noah | 100% | 96% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | KABARITI Karim | 100% | 96% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
| 59 | STORER Alexander | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 60 | DELL George H. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 61 | MCCONKEY Eric | 100% | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 62 | ZMUDA Aiden | 100% | 98% | 78% | 28% | 4% | - | - |
| 62 | LINEBERRY CADEN | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | STELLPFLUG Zachary | 100% | 74% | 28% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | SMITH Erick | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 66 | DECKER Evan M. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 39% | 2% | - | - |
| 67 | KAIHATSU Edward J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% | 9% |
| 68 | TIAN Nicolas | 100% | 94% | 68% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
| 69 | SYMMANK Callen | 100% | 97% | 75% | 26% | 3% | - | - |
| 70 | NAIDL Micah | 100% | 78% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | FEEHAN Conor | 100% | 74% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 72 | IBARRA Alejandro | 100% | 80% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 73 | MARTIN Dexter | 100% | 84% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 74 | KIM Ethen | 100% | 58% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 75 | CRUZ Ben | 100% | 37% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 76 | CRONK Trevor | 100% | 51% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 77 | SOKOLIK Lucas W. | 100% | 73% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 78 | HEUER Weston | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 79 | LEE Hans | 100% | 96% | 71% | 29% | 4% | - | - |
| 80 | ZHANG Hanson | 100% | 65% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 81 | LEYLAND John | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% |
| 82 | CLIPPARD Erik J. | 100% | 72% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 83 | CHAN William | 100% | 38% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 84 | DAVIS Jace W. | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 84 | VAGGALIS Denny | 100% | 60% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 84 | KTSANES Charlie | 100% | 96% | 71% | 29% | 4% | - | - |
| 84 | MISIOURA Mark | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 88 | HAGLER Alexziah | 100% | 77% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 89 | PFISTER Cameron | 100% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.