Freehold Fencing Academy - Freehold, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | HORSLEY Asherah | V V V V D V | V V V V V | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 2 | MILLER Dillon | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 3 | PETERS Nathan M. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 3 | PECK Quinn | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 5 | JANNEY Jonathan | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 6 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 7 | THOMAS Liam | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 8 | BLACK Zachary | D V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 9 | DEEB Adam | V D V V V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 10 | ASCIONED'ELIA Adam I. | D V V D V V | V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 11 | LEONG Samuel | V D V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 12 | BELOKON Sammy | D V V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 13 | ZHANG Ethan | V D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 14 | EZEKIEL Nathan | V D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 15 | CHENG Karter | D V D V D | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 16 | KURPASKA Jonathan A. | D D D V D V | V D | 5.1 | 2 | -3.1 |
| 17 | SHICK Veronika | V V V V D | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 18 | MCENTEE Owen | D V V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 19 | VISHNEVSKY Aden | D D D V V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 20 | ZHANG Julian | V V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 21 | BEKIYANTS Elizabeth | V D D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 22 | SANTHOSH Rithwik | D V D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 23 | PEREZ Logan | V D D V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 24 | SIELSKI Evan | D D V V D D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 25 | XU Lucas | D V D V D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 26 | ROJAS Elijah | D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 27 | SEETOO David | D D D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 28 | KUO Phineas | V D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 29 | MURPHY Damian J. | D D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 30 | WARD Evan | D D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 31 | LAZAR Carolina | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 32 | LAU Winston | D D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 33 | GANDHI Anjali | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.