Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LA ROSA Federico | D V D D V | V V V V V V | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 2 | FUNK Theo S. | D D V V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 3 | JEON Alexander E. | D V V V D D | V V V D | 5.1 | 3 | -2.1 |
| 3 | CATLIN Adam | V V V D D V | V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 5 | HONG Daniel | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 6 | NGUYEN Jett | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 7 | TOBIN Ryan | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 8 | WILKENS Zach Q. | D V V V D V | V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 9 | PROUTY Nicholas C. | V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 10 | SCHENCK Theo | V V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 11 | WONG Anthony M. | D V V V V V | V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 12 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | V V D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 13 | HO Justin | V V D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 14 | NGUYEN Nish | V V D D V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 15 | WHARTON Zachary | V V V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 16 | FORTNER Lance R. | D V V V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 17 | OH Jonathan | V D V V V | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 18 | MORALES Ian N. | V D D V V V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 19 | MEINHOLD Li | V V V D V D | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 20 | KUMBLA Samarth | V D D V V V | D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 21 | HSIUNG Richie | D D V V V V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 22 | XIAO Edward | V D V D V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 23 | WU Conrad J. | V D D V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 23 | BARTEL Jacob L. | V V D V D D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 25 | PIESNER Joshua C. | D D V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 26 | KIM Aaron J. | D V D D D V | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 27 | MCCOSH Evin M. | D V D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 28 | CHENG Matthew S. | D V D D D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 28 | LAMBRECHT Julius | D D D V D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 30 | HODESS Ethan | V D D D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 31 | ARNOLD Oscar A. | D D D V D D | V D | 4.1 | 1 | -3.1 |
| 32 | GOLDADE Luke A. | D D D D D | V D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 33 | LUNA Emilio | D D V V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 34 | LEE David Y. | D V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 35 | WONG Luke S. | D D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 36 | SELIVANOV Adam | D V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 37 | WOMACH Tristan | D D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 38 | MASCARI DUMONT Alexandre | D D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 39 | MA Jonas(zhao long) | D V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 40 | HOBSON Aaron K. | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 41 | LYMAN Finnian S. | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.