Golisano Training Center at Nazareth University - Rochester, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SINGLETON Aman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% |
| 2 | ADDYSON Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 17% |
| 3 | LUO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
| 3 | ZHANG Marcus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 52% | 11% |
| 5 | KIM Henry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
| 6 | FONG Kobe | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% | |
| 7 | LEE Anton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% | |
| 8 | MANSFIELD Hunter | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 5% | |
| 9 | CHEN Isaac Zhi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 20% |
| 10 | CHO Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% | |
| 11 | NG Nico | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% | |
| 12 | NOOL Alexander | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | ||
| 13 | ZHENG Jason | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 4% |
| 14 | ZHAI Junqi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 38% |
| 15 | ZHOU Zhi Matthew | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 11% | ||
| 16 | HERDMAN Julian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 36% | 8% |
| 17 | MIDYANY Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
| 18 | WANG Eason | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% | |
| 19 | SZCZAPA Lukas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% | 5% |
| 20 | KATS Brandon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 9% |
| 20 | HUANG Max | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 22 | WANG Marcus | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
| 23 | MOORE Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 28% | |
| 24 | LEE Leo | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 26% | 4% | |
| 25 | KROPP Wesley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
| 26 | YAO Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% | 3% |
| 27 | CHIANG William | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 28 | TUNG Charlie | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% | |
| 30 | CASH William Li | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 31 | ARMSTRONG Payson | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | |
| 32 | VASILEV Victor | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 33 | TOWNSHEND Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% |
| 34 | TSIEN Richard | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
| 35 | YAO Aiden | 100% | 100% | 82% | 44% | 11% | 1% | |
| 36 | BHANDARE Veer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 12% |
| 37 | MASKIN Mikhail | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | BRESLAV Asher | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 39 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 3% | |
| 40 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 86% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | PUTHOFF Henry | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% | |
| 42 | PENG Ethan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 43 | ROBERTS Arthur | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 44 | CHEN Hayden | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 45 | CHEN Regis | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 46 | YOON Jonathan | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 47 | THOMAS Andrew | 100% | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
| 48 | DANG William | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 2% | |
| 49 | GAO Ryan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 4% | |
| 50 | TANG Colin | 100% | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
| 51 | LEE Harrison | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 52 | FOGEL Jake | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
| 53 | GUNDUBOGULA Saket | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% | 5% |
| 53 | WU Jiachen | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 55 | CHEN Daniel | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 56 | ZHENG Jasper | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 57 | LAU LUCAS | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 4% | |
| 58 | BOBORIS Dimitrios | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | TANG Luke | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 60 | FANG Charlie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 61 | SCHLUBACH Jasper | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 62 | JIANG Aidan | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 63 | MUELLER Travis | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | LAI Jayden | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 3% | ||
| 65 | ZINCHUK Yuri | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 66 | LIU-XUE Shuliang | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 67 | WEI Noah | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 68 | KIM Siwoo | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 69 | MA Joseph | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 69 | JIN Noah | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 71 | GRIGORENKO Gleb E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% | |
| 72 | LI Jayden | 100% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | ||
| 73 | KIM Louie | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 1% | ||
| 74 | SHAPIRO Samuel | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 75 | CHEN Aiden | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 76 | KLOTS Theo | 100% | 98% | 79% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 77 | HOREMIOTIS Bennett | 100% | 95% | 74% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 78 | NOOL Aaron | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 79 | LAI Jaxon | 100% | 93% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 80 | HOLBROOK Silas | 100% | 81% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 81 | CIANCHETTA David | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 82 | MADRIGAL SALVAT Guillermo | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 2% | |
| 83 | WILLIAMS Gavin | 100% | 80% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 84 | ZHAO Brandon | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 85 | YOU Emmanuel | 100% | 55% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 86 | LEE Taeryum | 100% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 87 | ZAGRAN Ivan | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 88 | ZHANG Jacob | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 88 | ECCLESTONE Liam | 100% | 9% | - | - | - | - | |
| 90 | BARTON Christian | 100% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 91 | MCGRATH Hogan | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 92 | SCOGGIN Charles | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.