Golisano Training Center at Nazareth University - Rochester, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHIN Elizabeth | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% |
| 2 | PUTHOFF Olivia | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 42% | |
| 3 | HUSSIAN Annabelle | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 3 | KRAHE Annika | - | - | 6% | 26% | 44% | 25% | |
| 5 | ORRINGER Lottie | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 21% | |
| 6 | CAO Amelie | - | - | 4% | 21% | 47% | 28% | |
| 7 | WANG DINA C. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 25% |
| 8 | CHAN Jolene | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 3% |
| 9 | WANG CAROL | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
| 10 | KUANG Bella | 1% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 11 | LI Savannah | - | - | 3% | 20% | 46% | 31% | |
| 12 | LIN Katherine | - | 2% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 8% | |
| 13 | HUANG Natalie | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 14 | PAN Yiran | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 15 | CHUNG Stella | 4% | 34% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 16 | LI Junhan | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 17 | LI Joy | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 18 | XING Melly | - | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
| 19 | KOESTERS Florentine | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 20 | WANG Annie | - | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
| 21 | WU Maggie Lei | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
| 22 | LEO Jenna | 2% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
| 22 | HU Sophie | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 17% | |
| 24 | VACCARO Lillian | 12% | 38% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 25 | ZHU Ella | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 2% |
| 26 | YUAN Agnes | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% |
| 27 | ROBERTS Anastasia | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | |
| 28 | DONG Katelyn | 42% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 29 | YIN Emily | 13% | 57% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 30 | DONG Iris | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | |
| 31 | SHUI Zola | 29% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 32 | SUN Nicole | 6% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 33 | FAN Melody | 24% | 45% | 25% | 6% | - | - | |
| 34 | BO Iris | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 35 | HOLLIS Priscillia | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 36 | EPSTEIN Naomi | - | 6% | 34% | 40% | 17% | 3% | |
| 37 | ZHANG Caroline | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 38 | WARDMAN Abigail | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | DHALIWAL Seerat | 1% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 40 | SHANG Arianna | 2% | 13% | 37% | 36% | 11% | 1% | |
| 41 | LU Chloe | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | LOBO Sophie | 74% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 43 | BALMER Zoe | 80% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | HUDSON Sophie | 35% | 45% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 45 | GUSTAFSSON Anna | 80% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.