Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Zoe | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 2 | AVAKIAN Mikaela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% |
| 3 | GOUHIN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 11% |
| 3 | MOYA Keona L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 5 | FAHRI Monir J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 34% | 8% |
| 6 | KOZAK Sonja A. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 7 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 8 | HUNTER Nina B. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 9 | CAO Stephanie X. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 11% |
| 10 | LU Vivian Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 40% | 6% |
| 11 | LIANG Megan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
| 12 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | 8% |
| 13 | LI Anna M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 14 | TZOU Alexandra | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 15 | CHERNOMORSKY Maria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 12% |
| 16 | TANG Annie L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 9% |
| 17 | HARRISON Imogen N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
| 18 | BUCHMANN Vivien | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 19 | MILLER Sky | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 14% |
| 20 | POSSICK Lola P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 35% |
| 21 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
| 21 | ROH Rachel E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 23 | PAK Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 24 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 25 | KIM Catherine | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | LEE Alexandra B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 10% |
| 27 | BERMAN Stella | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
| 28 | PRIESTLEY Catherine (Cate) C. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 51% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 28 | WU Erica L. | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 30 | YAP Madeline | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 8% |
| 31 | FLOREZ Melissa | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 2% |
| 32 | DI PERNA Chiara I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 4% |
| 33 | KOVACS Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 8% |
| 34 | WHANG Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% |
| 35 | KATZ Anat | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
| 36 | OISHI Megumi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 26% |
| 37 | KONG Vera | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 38 | STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% |
| 39 | KALRA Himani V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 10% |
| 40 | SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% |
| 41 | HOOGENDOORN Sterre | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 42 | YUN Maya | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 43 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 44 | TONG Kunling | 100% | 96% | 76% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 45 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 30% | 4% |
| 46 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 47 | LACSON Sarah | 100% | 84% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 5% |
| 49 | BEALE Zoe M. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 50 | KOBOZEVA Tamara V. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 51 | DUNGEY Amelia S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 52 | CHIN Erika J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 11% |
| 53 | BLUM Leah I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
| 54 | DARINGA Arianna | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 5% |
| 55 | CHEEMA Sophia | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 56 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
| 57 | WEINBERG Alexandra L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 14% |
| 58 | HOOGENDOORN Levi | 100% | 91% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 59 | REDDY Shreya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 21% | 4% |
| 60 | KALRA Siya L. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 61 | TANG Catherine H. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 62 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 63 | LAMOTHE Laurie-Ann | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 64 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 65 | ATLURI Sara V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% | 3% |
| 66 | HAN Jeanette X. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 67 | CHING Sapphira S. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 68 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 31% | 6% |
| 69 | STONE Hava S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 70 | NOBREGA Carolina S. | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 71 | BROWN Emma | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 72 | BOURGEOIS Audreane | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 73 | CHEN Jane | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 74 | TUCKER Iman R. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 75 | BENTOLILA Thalia | 100% | 94% | 63% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 76 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 77 | JULIEN Michelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
| 78 | MATAIEV Natalie S. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 79 | OXENSTIERNA Carolina | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 80 | BURCH Makana Y. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 81 | SHIN Andrea Y. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 82 | HE Charlotte | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 83 | SCHMITT Alana P. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 83 | LARIMER Katherine E. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 85 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 37% | 11% | 2% |
| 86 | VAN ATTA Grace Y. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 87 | CANNON Sophia E. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 88 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 100% | 98% | 76% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 89 | CODY Alexandra C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 17% | 2% |
| 90 | PANIGRAHI Sophia | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 91 | KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 92 | LIU Rachel | 100% | 71% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 93 | D'ORAZIO Isabella | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 94 | LU Amy | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 95 | LI Victoria J. | 100% | 86% | 53% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 96 | NEWELL Alexia C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
| 97 | CHEN Erica | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 98 | LIGH Karis | 100% | 74% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 99 | GAJOWSKYJ Sophie K. | 100% | 88% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 100 | CALVERT Sarah-Jane E. | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 101 | ABOUDAHER Janna A. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 102 | RIZKALA Joanna | 100% | 88% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 102 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 102 | SZETO Chloe | 100% | 90% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 105 | HOVERMAN Hannah A. | 100% | 89% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 106 | TURNOF Kayla M. | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 106 | CHEN Xinyan | 100% | 56% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 108 | MERRIAM Katherine I. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 109 | BAE EMMELINE | 100% | 59% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 110 | ZINNI Kaylyn M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 111 | PETE Gillian C. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 112 | BENTOLILA Yedida | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 113 | FAY Zoe A. | 100% | 88% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 114 | DHAR Aamina | 100% | 87% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 115 | LIN Zhiyin | 100% | 72% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 116 | WHEELER Kira | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 116 | RANGANATHAN Ruchi | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 118 | FU Linqian (Helen) | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 119 | CUNNINGHAM Erin | 100% | 80% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.