San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | - | 7% | 53% | 40% |
2 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | - | 7% | 35% | 58% | |
3 | LUO Sandra J. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% | |
3 | WANG Zoie Z. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% | |
5 | FUNG Vera | 2% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
6 | FUNG Emma | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 1% |
7 | WANG Celine S. | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
8 | BOLES Amanda X. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 42% | 15% | |
9 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | 2% | 25% | 45% | 25% | 3% | |
10 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% | |
11 | ZHANG Eunice | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 22% | |
12 | NAIR Supriya | - | 2% | 24% | 45% | 26% | 4% | |
13 | HOVAGHIMIAN Fira | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 3% | |
14 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 35% | 6% | |
15 | KIM Rachel | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | - |
16 | XU Audrey J. | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
17 | SINGH Ashni | 4% | 29% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
18 | MANN Sophia J. | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
19 | LENK Sophie | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
20 | HO Kristen | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
21 | LIU Emma | - | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 4% | |
22 | VO Bao-Vy | - | 1% | 20% | 44% | 31% | 5% | |
23 | ZHENG Zoe | 1% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
24 | TSANG Catherine | - | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
25 | PENG Serena | - | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
26 | THOMAS Saejel | 25% | 49% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
27 | LIU Jessica | 3% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 7% | - | |
28 | ENRILE Erica | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
29 | SANTOS Emilia | 1% | 12% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | |
30 | MU Allison | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
31 | LUH Mia P. | 1% | 11% | 34% | 38% | 15% | 1% | |
32 | CUI Alivia | 12% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
33 | CHUNG Penelope | 47% | 47% | 5% | - | - | - | |
34 | CHOI Kailyn | 45% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
35 | YANG Chloee | 42% | 52% | 6% | - | - | - | |
36 | OH Ceana | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
37 | LI Emma | 45% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.