San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 40% |
| 2 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 58% | |
| 3 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
| 3 | WANG Zoie Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | |
| 5 | FUNG Vera | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 11% | 1% | |
| 6 | FUNG Emma | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 20% | 1% |
| 7 | WANG Celine S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | |
| 8 | BOLES Amanda X. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 15% | |
| 9 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 100% | 100% | 98% | 73% | 28% | 3% | |
| 10 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | |
| 11 | ZHANG Eunice | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 22% | |
| 12 | NAIR Supriya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% | 30% | 4% | |
| 13 | HOVAGHIMIAN Fira | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 25% | 3% | |
| 14 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 6% | |
| 15 | KIM Rachel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 16 | XU Audrey J. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 17 | SINGH Ashni | 100% | 96% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 18 | MANN Sophia J. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 19 | LENK Sophie | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 20 | HO Kristen | 100% | 70% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 21 | LIU Emma | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 4% | |
| 22 | VO Bao-Vy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 79% | 35% | 5% | |
| 23 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 15% | 2% | |
| 24 | TSANG Catherine | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 25 | PENG Serena | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
| 26 | THOMAS Saejel | 100% | 75% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 27 | LIU Jessica | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 7% | - | |
| 28 | ENRILE Erica | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 29 | SANTOS Emilia | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | |
| 30 | MU Allison | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 31 | LUH Mia P. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 16% | 1% | |
| 32 | CUI Alivia | 100% | 88% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | CHUNG Penelope | 100% | 53% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 34 | CHOI Kailyn | 100% | 55% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 35 | YANG Chloee | 100% | 58% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 36 | OH Ceana | 100% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | LI Emma | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.