Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Field House) - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Dina C. | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 70% | |
| 2 | JIANG Chloe | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 66% | |
| 3 | JOO Sara | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
| 3 | LI Christina | - | - | - | 8% | 42% | 50% | |
| 5 | SHIN Elizabeth | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 44% |
| 6 | BYK Karalina | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
| 7 | LI Savannah | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 39% | |
| 8 | CAO Amelie | - | - | - | 3% | 31% | 66% | |
| 9 | LUO Lucy | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% |
| 10 | CHUNG Stella | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 2% |
| 11 | CHAN Jolene | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 43% | 15% | |
| 12 | LIN Claire | - | 6% | 30% | 48% | 16% | ||
| 13 | GENG Emma | 4% | 26% | 46% | 21% | 2% | ||
| 14 | EPSTEIN Naomi | - | - | 3% | 19% | 52% | 26% | |
| 15 | LEE So Hyung | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 45% | 18% |
| 16 | ZHILKOV Anya | - | - | 6% | 31% | 50% | 12% | |
| 17 | ROBERTS Anastasia | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
| 18 | LI Joy | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 44% | 43% |
| 19 | ZHU Alivia | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 20 | BO Iris | - | - | 3% | 21% | 58% | 19% | |
| 21 | CHOI Cara | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 37% | 6% | |
| 22 | LLOYD Bianca | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 37% | 8% | - |
| 23 | GOODMAN Carden | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% |
| 24 | WU Maggie Lei | - | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 8% |
| 25 | ZHENG Annalyn | - | 4% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 5% | |
| 26 | XING Melly | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% | ||
| 27 | PAEK Mila | 2% | 18% | 42% | 32% | 5% | - | |
| 28 | MURPHY Genevieve | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 18% | |
| 29 | MACKINTOSH Quinn | - | 6% | 29% | 46% | 18% | 1% | |
| 30 | KANDALAFT Emma | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 31 | BAULIN Zoya | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 32 | HEMPHILL Mia | 13% | 44% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | COUAILLIER Lou | - | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 34 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 20% | 3% | |
| 35 | PAEK Ellie | 1% | 12% | 37% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 36 | MCCLELLAN Florence | 38% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | ||
| 37 | YOUM Amelia | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 38 | HOLLIS Priscillia | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 39 | ZHU Audrey | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 40 | VO Evelyn | 1% | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 41 | CHAN Kaitlyn | - | 6% | 32% | 43% | 17% | 1% | |
| 42 | FERRARI Ande | 33% | 44% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 43 | OTTAVIANO Maris | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | WU Charlotte | 1% | 12% | 37% | 37% | 12% | 1% | |
| 45 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | 3% | 22% | 43% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 46 | ZELDIN Nina | 9% | 39% | 38% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | BENTLEY Amelia | 30% | 48% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 48 | SICHEL-OUTCALT Margaret | 28% | 48% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 49 | HOU Xu | - | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 50 | TEE Cymbeline | 5% | 27% | 43% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 51 | KIM Lael | 3% | 22% | 44% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 52 | JIN Emily | 35% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 53 | CULLEN Serena | 23% | 48% | 25% | 4% | - | ||
| 54 | SARAVANA Supriti | 2% | 20% | 46% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 55 | KAPUR Vanya | 13% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 56 | YEH Constance | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | LU Sophia | 2% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 58 | BENNETT Emi | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 59 | CLOUD Chrystie | 19% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | LU Miaotian | 12% | 38% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | DAVIS Gabriella | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 62 | MIN Claire | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 64 | MA Cloris | 50% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 65 | GOMEZ Amelia | 25% | 45% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 66 | ZHU Alicia | 18% | 45% | 30% | 7% | - | - | |
| 67 | LOBO Sophie | 37% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 68 | CHESK Kamila | 51% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 69 | DUNCAN Kate | 6% | 52% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | PARK Addison | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.