Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Field House) - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TSAO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 12% | |
| 2 | NOVOSYOLOK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% |
| 3 | PAVLENISHVILI Luke | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 3 | PORTER Dupree | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
| 5 | WANG Theodore | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
| 6 | WAXLER Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% | |
| 7 | MATTOO Dhruv | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 8 | GRIECI Noah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% | |
| 9 | LAZARTE Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 5% |
| 10 | WU Timothy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 16% |
| 11 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 25% | 4% |
| 12 | WANG William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 29% |
| 13 | YU Zhexuan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% | |
| 14 | BALE ATMAN | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 13% | |
| 15 | WONG Mac | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 5% |
| 16 | NOTOPRADONO Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 11% | |
| 17 | LAMTAN Christoffer | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
| 18 | JI Johnson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 20% | |
| 19 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 20 | SADHU Neiyam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 20% |
| 21 | KHOTLINE Daniel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | |
| 22 | WONG Caleb W. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 6% | |
| 23 | PARK Inwoo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
| 24 | HO Nathaniel | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 14% | 2% | |
| 25 | FIROOZI Sam | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 26 | ZWAKA Jonas | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | |
| 27 | COPP Max | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 28 | WASCO Andrew | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 29 | HUANG Alexander C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | |
| 30 | JIANG Terence | 100% | 97% | 73% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
| 31 | LIEBOWITZ Carson | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 32 | LEVIN Jacob | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | 1% | |
| 33 | SWIFT Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 21% |
| 34 | LOSQUADRO Joseph | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 35 | WEISS Toby | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 36 | LIU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 37 | ZHANG Joseph | 100% | 87% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | COUNTS Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 4% | |
| 40 | CHENG Sawyer | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 41 | MUKHERJEE Aryan | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 42 | KENNEDY Tomás | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | JAIN Karanvir | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 44 | DAYAMA Ronak | 100% | 100% | 92% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 45 | MARTINEZ Luke | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | HELD Lev | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 47 | CHIEN Nolan | 100% | 97% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 48 | JARAMILLO Juan | 100% | 93% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 49 | GREENE Kevin | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 50 | ZHENG Lucas | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | DREYER William | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 52 | ZHIVICH Theo | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 53 | PERRY Xander | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | CHIN Adrian | 100% | 88% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 55 | NIEBERGALL Jaxson | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | MARSHQUIST Miles | 100% | 50% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 57 | STEWART Samuel | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | BERGHAUSER Zachary | 100% | 29% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 59 | LIEU Nicholas | 100% | 70% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.