Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Field House) - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XING Melly | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 44% | 41% |
| 2 | ZHILKOV Anya | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 49% | 23% |
| 3 | MURPHY Genevieve | - | - | - | 3% | 21% | 50% | 25% |
| 3 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 19% | 2% |
| 5 | LUO Lucy | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 45% | 24% |
| 5 | LEE So Hyung | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 44% | 43% |
| 7 | LIN Claire | - | - | 3% | 21% | 47% | 28% | |
| 8 | ZHU Alivia | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% |
| 9 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 44% | 19% |
| 10 | WANG Joann | - | - | 2% | 17% | 47% | 34% | |
| 11 | KIM Lael | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 12 | ZHENG Annalyn | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 45% | 31% |
| 13 | GENG Emma | - | 1% | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% |
| 15 | JU Victoria | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 16 | VO Evelyn | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 17 | PAEK Ellie | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 18 | WANG Christina | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 19 | DONG Audrey | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 20 | WANG Sally | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 21 | JIN Emily | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 22 | TOWNLEY Mira | 14% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 23 | LU Sophia | - | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 24 | LE Minnie | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 13% | 1% | |
| 25 | LU Miaotian | 6% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | CLOUD Chrystie | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 27 | WANG Michelle | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 28 | ZELDIN Nina | 11% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 28 | MEHTA Zara | 1% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 30 | GOMEZ Amelia | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 31 | LIU Zihe | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 32 | ZHU Alicia | 21% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | DOMINIK Eliana | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 34 | CHIN Harper | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 35 | LEVITE Lilliana | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 36 | CLOUD Cailynn | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | SU Angela | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 38 | MA Cloris | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 39 | WANG Kelly | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | POONIA Akira | 10% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | CHEN Quianna | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | NIVAS Tvisha | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.