Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XU Marie-Anne J. | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
| 2 | CHO Cameron S. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 3 | SUH Kailey E. | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | |
| 3 | KIM Katherine | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 5 | YIN Helen | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 6 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 3% | |
| 7 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 10% | |
| 8 | LOCKE Savannah | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 9 | KANG Jiyoon | 1% | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 10 | PENG Amber L. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
| 12 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 13 | PRIETO Sofia M. | 2% | 11% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 7% | 1% |
| 14 | WADHWANI Liana A. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
| 15 | KUMAR Anmol | 5% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 16 | SHUM Elizabeth | 19% | 45% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | UMAP Arna | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 18 | LAI Evelyn | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% | |
| 19 | KOSLOW Amicie | 2% | 12% | 29% | 32% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 20 | HWANG Jungmin | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | DANG Elizabeth H. | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 22 | OLSHANSKY Eliora S. | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 23 | HOBSON Ava | 20% | 46% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 24 | HSIUNG Samantha | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 25 | YANG Helen | 12% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.