NJ Convention & Exposition Center - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUCAS William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 10% |
| 2 | SRIVATS Vedh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 57% | 20% |
| 3 | MCDONALD Finn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
| 3 | JI Johnson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
| 5 | DAI Zihou | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 16% |
| 6 | BAI Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 80% | 48% | 14% |
| 7 | PORTER Dupree | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | |
| 8 | ZHAO Royce | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
| 9 | LIU Marvin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 10 | BARENBOYM Michael | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 6% | |
| 11 | CIEMINS Henry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% |
| 12 | WEI William | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
| 13 | BELAND Riley James "RJ" | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 3% |
| 14 | SADHU Neiyam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
| 14 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 16 | ROSADO CRUZ Keviel | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 5% | 1% |
| 17 | CLARK Aram | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% |
| 18 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 4% |
| 19 | DOSTAL Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 20 | ZWAKA Jonas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 21 | CAI Jeff | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% |
| 22 | LIEBOWITZ Carson | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 23 | WASCO Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 24 | MEDVINSKY Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 25 | KHOTLINE Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 26 | ARCHIBALD Zachary | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | HU Jayden | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 28 | ORTIZ MATIAS Armando J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 29 | LORENZ Evan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 65% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | HELD Lev | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 31 | ZHANG Ray | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 32 | LIU Eric | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 33 | LI Cooper | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 26% | 4% |
| 34 | CHANG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
| 35 | MARTINSON Torm | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 21% | 2% |
| 36 | LAU Kyrus | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 37 | DOMINIQUE Remson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
| 38 | NAYAGAM Nishant | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 39 | WANG Theodore | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 40 | GUERRA Corey | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 41 | EKONG-REID Severian | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 42 | STEWART Samuel | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 43 | KETT Richard | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 44 | ZHU Bob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
| 45 | ORIE Sohan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 46 | CHEN Brendan | 100% | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 47 | ROPER F. Elijah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 48 | TSAO Alister | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 49 | SHAPIRO Leo | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 50 | ZHANG Joseph | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 51 | LIANG Morgan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 52 | LOO Jason | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 53 | LIU Guanyu | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 54 | CHAVAN Aditya | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 55 | WANG Alex | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 12% | |
| 56 | ZHANG Simon | 100% | 96% | 74% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
| 57 | MARCELLINO Robert | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 58 | PARK Inwoo | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 59 | MENZIES Liam | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 60 | WU Vincent | 100% | 95% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 60 | DEMERS Bodhi | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 62 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 63 | MAGITSKY Isaac | 100% | 81% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | ROMBERG Sam | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 65 | DAVID Ediel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 66 | LI Michael | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 67 | SUN Stephen | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 68 | BENNETT Lachlan | 100% | 83% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 69 | DAYAMA Ronak | 100% | 96% | 77% | 45% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 70 | BANKO Ethan | 100% | 67% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 71 | BARAVARIAN Cole | 100% | 96% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 72 | FREILICH Harrison | 100% | 80% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 73 | MENKEN Asher | 100% | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 74 | TAKEBE Ren | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 75 | SUBA Mason | 100% | 97% | 77% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 76 | DIAZ ORTIZ Kevin J | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | 1% |
| 77 | CHIANG Ethan | 100% | 96% | 66% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 78 | LEE Korbon | 100% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 79 | LI Kent | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 80 | MEISSNER Brodie | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 81 | JIN Yubo | 100% | 70% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 82 | KHAN Abdur-Rahman | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 83 | JANG Junyeong | 100% | 93% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 84 | LEE Ivan | 100% | 85% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 85 | LEVIN Jacob | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 86 | SONG Ryan | 100% | 80% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 87 | SOMANI Aarav | 100% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 88 | RAGHUNANDAN Evan | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 88 | KHADAKBAN Soham | 100% | 98% | 76% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 88 | RIJO HERNANDEZ Onexis D. | 100% | 96% | 68% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.