NJ Convention & Exposition Center - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HU Anna | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 2 | DAMBAL Sasha | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% |
| 3 | LI Sonia | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 35% |
| 3 | SUN Yi | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 40% | 13% |
| 5 | CROOKS Riley | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
| 6 | BORGUETA Madison | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
| 7 | LEE Grace | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 15% | 2% |
| 8 | ZHANG Audrey | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 9 | PARK Haylie | - | 1% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 12% | |
| 10 | XU Elaine | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 46% | 24% |
| 11 | REN Katherine | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 28% |
| 12 | YANNOPOULOS Pompie | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 13% |
| 13 | HUANG Pierra | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 14 | SUNG Olivia | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 15 | LAFFY Lily | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
| 16 | ZHANG Ashley | - | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% |
| 17 | TA-ZHOU Emma | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 39% | 19% |
| 18 | CHANG Norah | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% |
| 19 | CASTELO Soleil | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% | |
| 20 | SEVASTOPULO Sahra | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 21 | NADKARNI Marisa | - | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
| 22 | WONG Charlene | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 5% | |
| 23 | MAK Kaitlin | - | - | 7% | 28% | 43% | 23% | |
| 24 | DUTA Lyra | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 25 | VISWANATHAN Nishka | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | WANG JiaQi | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 27 | NG Sophia | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 28 | LOO Kaitlyn | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 12% | |
| 29 | NANDA Maanika | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 30 | BERRIOS Catalina | - | 4% | 27% | 41% | 24% | 5% | |
| 31 | CHEN Victoria | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 32 | LEE Kaitlin | 5% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 33 | VATS Ishita | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | |
| 34 | BARNES Sarah | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | |
| 35 | MAK Jayden | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
| 36 | DESAUTELS Alexandra | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 37 | TA-ZHOU Sophia | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 38 | MYAT Chloe | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 7% |
| 39 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Maia | 2% | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 40 | NIU Jessica | - | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 43% | 18% |
| 41 | FANG Darcy | 8% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | BANDHU Saahiti | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | GENTILE Vittoria | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
| 44 | ARIF Haniya | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | VATSA Shradha | 32% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 46 | FABRICANT Kioka R. | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
| 47 | KIM Audrey | - | 2% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 8% | |
| 48 | RANDALL-COLLINS Shea M. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 49 | SIROIS Neve | 3% | 16% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 50 | BONNICK Madison | 5% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | WEI Madison | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 52 | SEO Yunseo | 11% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | FAZAL Sasha | 7% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | TASSONE Charlie | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 55 | DATLA Aanya | 18% | 44% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | COOKE Dallis | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | MISHRA Riona | 10% | 45% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | ENG Gabrielle | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 58 | SYKES Eleanor | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 60 | LI Tiffany | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | |
| 61 | KIM isabel | 25% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | DEMRY Kylee | 18% | 41% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | RIVERA FRAGOSO Arelys Marie | 3% | 33% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 64 | DILALLO Olivia | 43% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 65 | GOODWIN Julia | 23% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 66 | ZHOU Claire | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 67 | CANARAN Daphne M. | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 68 | FANG Elena | 16% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 69 | LIAO Amber | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 70 | MADDISON Erica | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 71 | CHO Hayoon | 66% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 72 | SVIDER Elle | 33% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.