University of Houston - Campus Recreation and Wellness Center - Houston, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KNYSH Oleg | - | - | - | - | - | 5% | 95% |
| 2 | FRAY Alexander | - | - | - | - | 4% | 31% | 65% |
| 3 | NEAL John P. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 46% | 14% |
| 3 | MULDOON Thomas | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% | < 1% |
| 5 | LIBSON Tazman | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 42% | 23% |
| 6 | ELHUSSEINI Kyle | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% |
| 7 | NIXON Scott | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
| 8 | TIEMANN Landen | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% | - |
| 9 | SEEFELDT William Henry C. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 10 | CHIN Dylan A. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 13% | - |
| 11 | GOODMAN Benjamin | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 12 | ELHUSSEINI Dylan | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% |
| 13 | ASGARALLY Anthony | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 16% | 2% |
| 14 | STONE Gregory R. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 48% | 12% |
| 15 | DECKER Hunter | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 16 | IBANEZ Benjamin | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 17 | JOHNSON Ryder | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 18 | AJNSZTAJN Alec J. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
| 19 | PHILLIPS Scott Q. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% |
| 20 | DADE MAXIMUS | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 21 | KIM Gene | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 22 | LEE Stewart S. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 20% |
| 22 | TRACY James | 6% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 24 | TUMULA Arihaan | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 25 | LOBO Mauricio | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 26 | SATHYAN Dev | 24% | 45% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | WINKLER Michael | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 28 | BRUS Brian V. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 29 | CHAN Kyle Si Tin | 11% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | DÍAZ Gerardo | 6% | 36% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | PARKS-GOOD Tyler | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | ELLISOR Drayten | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
| 33 | PARISI Nolan W. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 34 | HUANG Ethan | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 35 | SABAH Alan | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 36 | POHL Philip | 16% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | BARGE Jackson | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 38 | DINH Nam | 15% | 42% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | BACCHUS Sheik | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | SMUDA Alexander | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 41 | VILLAREAL Quentin | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 42 | SAI KOLAPPAN Naren Sankar | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.