Caribe Royale Orlando - Orlando, FL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHAI Junqi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 32% |
| 2 | CHEN Tianjun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% |
| 3 | KROPP Wesley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
| 3 | LIU Austin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 14% | |
| 5 | MOORE Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% | |
| 6 | CHEN Cameron | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 7 | TANG Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 12% | |
| 8 | MOSLEY Wally | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 12% | |
| 9 | SHIM Jae | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% | ||
| 10 | CHO Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | |
| 11 | STRAFFORD Andrew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% | |
| 12 | CHEN Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 7% |
| 13 | CHIANG William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% | |
| 14 | SCORDINSKY Liam | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% | |
| 15 | PIMIENTO Tomas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% | |
| 16 | ROFINO Samuel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 8% | - |
| 17 | MITTELSTAEDT Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 42% |
| 19 | MORRISON Kieren | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 20 | TUDELA Francisco | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% | |
| 21 | WU Jiachen | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 22 | LEE Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 23 | KO Ethan | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | SUN Jiarui (Jerry) | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 25 | BEN-YOSEPH Rafael | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% | |
| 26 | LIU Yihong | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 15% | 1% | |
| 27 | SHAPIRO Samuel | 100% | 98% | 77% | 32% | 3% | ||
| 28 | CAVALLARO Sebastian | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 29 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% | |
| 30 | LI Nolan | 100% | 97% | 74% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 31 | SHIM Jaeyoo | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 32 | LAI Jayden | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 33 | KIM Julian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
| 35 | RICHMOND Ozan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% | |
| 36 | PARK Ethan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 37 | CHEN Jayden A | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | HUR Tyson | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 39 | YUE Bryan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 40 | GUJJA Rishabh | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 41 | BEZAS Constantine | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 42 | SCHLUBACH Jasper | 100% | 98% | 82% | 38% | 4% | ||
| 43 | LEE Leo | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
| 44 | PATEL Tej | 100% | 87% | 44% | 9% | - | ||
| 45 | WONG Sebastian | 100% | 95% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 46 | CHA Aiden | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 47 | CHEN Linus | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 48 | ZHU Brady | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 49 | GRAB Liam | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 50 | REYNOLDS CHANG Luke | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 51 | KIM Louie | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 52 | KIM William | 100% | 87% | 46% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 53 | CARCELLER Jeremias | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 7% | 1% | |
| 54 | MAXWELL Taiga | 100% | 88% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 55 | PATEL Yash | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | CHOPRA Vishnu | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 15% | 2% | |
| 57 | QU ethan | 100% | 85% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | MCGAHAN Cashton | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 59 | AUMSON Hubert | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 60 | CHEN Regis | 100% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 61 | SMITH Theo | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 62 | QIAN-LIU Zachary | 100% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 63 | MITTELSTAEDT EJ | 100% | 65% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | TIRINKIAN Zareh | 100% | 48% | 9% | 1% | - | ||
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.