Rocky Point, NY - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHA Russell W. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
2 | ROGAK Benjamin A. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 28% |
3 | KANG Michael H. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
3 | SHENG Patrick Y. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 11% |
5 | MORSE Tyler | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
6 | MCDERMOTT Brian | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% | |
7 | LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
8 | MACKIN Samuel | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
9 | DOLMETSCH Max | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
10 | INSLER Gabriel C. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
11 | KIM William M. | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
12 | LEHR William D. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
13 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
14 | FERREIRA Noah J. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
15 | WISNIEWSKI Bart | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
16 | TUCKER Owen J. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
17 | SIMPSON Patrick | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
18 | SKIFFINGTON Sam | 19% | 42% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
19 | REYES Vincent | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
20 | KASTENBERG Leo M. | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
21 | LONCAR Luka E. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
22 | LI Brian | 3% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
23 | HU Matthew | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
24 | DIXON Thomas | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
25 | DIXON Samuel | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
26 | KARAMANIAN Nicholas | 27% | 44% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
27 | CONNORS Jacob | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.