Royal Arts Fencing Academy - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MARSHALL John W. | - | - | - | 4% | 42% | 55% | |
| 2 | HUTTO Joshua | - | - | 10% | 38% | 41% | 11% | |
| 3 | WILSON Jeffrey M. | - | - | 2% | 23% | 50% | 24% | |
| 3 | THOMAS Samuel | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 43% | 15% | |
| 5 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% |
| 6 | EVERT Todd | - | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
| 7 | DAVIS Jennifer | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 8 | SOZANSKI Kyle S. | 2% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 9 | KRIEGER Nathanial | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 10 | CHU Duong | 4% | 31% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 11 | ECKEL Anson J. | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 37% | 9% | |
| 12 | WEISS Olivia | - | - | 1% | 13% | 44% | 37% | 4% |
| 13 | SNELL Andrew J. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
| 14 | SEABLOOM Jack | 3% | 20% | 42% | 31% | 4% | - | |
| 15 | VERWORN Jonathan | 63% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 16 | EPPLER Dominik | 24% | 43% | 27% | 6% | - | - | |
| 17 | MASSIE Jay Thomas | 5% | 41% | 44% | 10% | - | - | |
| 18 | MARTIN Avery | 11% | 40% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 19 | HUNKER Frederick | - | 3% | 25% | 60% | 11% | - | |
| 20 | WESTWOOD Stephen | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 21 | HUNT Isabel | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 22 | ADAMS Christopher | 61% | 35% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 23 | GUSKA Jenn | 35% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 24 | WILLIAMS Lydia | 8% | 34% | 40% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | HILL Jasmyn | < 1% | - | 8% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 2% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.