Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | AWAD Royce | - | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% |
| 2 | REDA Sophie | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 3 | KWON Ava | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 24% | |
| 3 | LIU Chelsea | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% | |
| 5 | ZHAO Selena | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 47% | 27% |
| 6 | VISWANATHAN Nishka | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 4% |
| 7 | FOSS Persephone | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% | |
| 8 | PARK Haylie | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 9 | BAIK Sarah | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 6% |
| 10 | MYAT Chloe | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% | |
| 11 | MERMEGAS Olivia | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% | |
| 11 | KIM Audrey | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% | |
| 13 | YANG Selina | - | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 14 | BARNES Sarah | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 15 | SUN Yi | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% | |
| 16 | SHI Chuqing | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 17 | CAFAGNA Sofia | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 3% | |
| 18 | YANNOPOULOS Pompie | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 46% | 32% |
| 19 | NIU Jessica | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% |
| 20 | MOTOVA Masha | - | 4% | 20% | 41% | 31% | 4% | |
| 21 | LEE Kaitlin | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 5% |
| 21 | CANARAN Daphne M. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 23 | AKULA Roszlynn | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 3% |
| 24 | UZAR Julianna | 2% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 1% | |
| 25 | JUNG Elise | 2% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
| 26 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 27 | WANG Chloe | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 28 | WONG Charlene | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 29 | ZHANG Emily | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | GOODWIN Julia | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 17% | 1% | |
| 31 | DILALLO Olivia | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 32 | CHAU Zoey | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 33 | LAFFY Lily | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 44% | 17% | |
| 34 | HILD Anya | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 35 | PARK Gabriella | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 36 | EDUSA Leilani | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 37 | ZHENG Winona | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
| 38 | RANDALL-COLLINS Shea M. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 39 | SIROIS Neve | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 40 | TASSONE Charlie | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 41 | HO Sophia | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 42 | SMITH Genevieve | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 43 | ZHOU Claire | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 44 | MADDISON Erica | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 45 | BUCCINO Sloane | 13% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 46 | KIM Eunjae | 9% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 47 | SAGER Bianca | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | PITRUN Viktorie | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 49 | MEHTA Anya | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 50 | DOROBANTU Emma | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 51 | DATLA Aanya | 24% | 44% | 25% | 6% | - | - | |
| 52 | JUN Sofia | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 53 | BREDBECK Margaret | 2% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 54 | WEI Madison | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 55 | VATSA Shradha | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 56 | SATHISH Sreesha | 11% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | LEE Jiyoung | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | TSUJIMOTO Mako | 2% | 11% | 27% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 59 | VINBOR COSTA SANTOS Sasha | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | HARRISON Allie | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 61 | BROGAN Samantha | 22% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | PARKER Mrinali | 42% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 63 | LEON Malolae | 8% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 64 | CHURCH Madeline | 27% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 65 | FINCH Skylar | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.