Capital Sports Center - McClellan Park, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | EVANS Desmond | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% | 4% |
| 2 | DING Sam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% |
| 3 | PARK Kaiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 24% |
| 3 | ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% | |
| 5 | RAU Shogun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 50% |
| 6 | AGARWAL Jagrav | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
| 7 | YU Jinyuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 24% | |
| 8 | ZHANG Charlie | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 15% | 2% | |
| 9 | JUE Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | |
| 10 | SINGH Reyaansh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
| 11 | SHAO Tysen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 35% | 6% | - |
| 12 | LIN Dylan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 13 | RAJ Yojith | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 9% | |
| 14 | NGUYEN Norris | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
| 15 | TIKHONOV Aleksandr | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | LI Mason | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% | 21% | 3% | |
| 17 | SITU Baiqin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 22% | |
| 18 | SUN Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% | |
| 19 | YAN Aaron | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 5% | - |
| 20 | HUANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 21 | HO Kasper | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
| 22 | LI Yunze | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 13% | |
| 23 | DONG YIKUN | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 24 | WANG Theodore | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 25 | LIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 8% |
| 26 | XU Benjamin | 100% | 89% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 27 | LI Lief | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 28% | 4% | |
| 28 | ZHANG Bryant | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | LEE Joshua | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
| 30 | KAJITA Grayson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 4% |
| 31 | COOK Owen | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 32 | MENG Andy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 33 | CHENG Alvin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
| 34 | MANANSALA Caleb | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% | |
| 35 | LIN Stewart | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 36 | BHOOMI Abhiram | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 37 | GU Evan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
| 38 | JACOBE Jakyn | 100% | 73% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 39 | WANG Andy | 100% | 88% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | ZENG Cayden | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 41 | XIE Garrett | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 42 | WONG Sebastian | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 43 | WANG Ian | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 44 | LEE Harry | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | WONG Kingston | 100% | 81% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | YUAN Vincent | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 47 | YANG Jaron | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 48 | SINGH Shiv | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | KIM Ryan | 100% | 97% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 50 | VIEN Bradley | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 51 | LUO Derren | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | LIU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
| 53 | HOVAGHIMIAN Atticus | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | STOCK Ian | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 55 | PHILLIPS Julian | 100% | 52% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 56 | LUI Jamie | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | MAK Avery | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 58 | SIMPSON Lucas | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | KIM Owen | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.